IUSQ.DE vs. IGLN.L
IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World (ACWI), while IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSQ.DE returned 12.55%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for IGLN.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUSQ.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IGLN.L.
Performance
IUSQ.DE vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUSQ.DE is traded in EUR, while IGLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSQ.DE achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's -0.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUSQ.DE having a 12.55% annualized return and IGLN.L not far behind at 12.09%.
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 6M
- 13.44%
- 1Y
- 26.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -9.23%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 22.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.36%
- 5Y*
- 18.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
IUSQ.DE vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.73% | 9.02% | 24.53% | 18.57% | -13.58% | 29.13% | 4.94% | 30.14% | -5.97% | 9.14% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -0.66% | 45.35% | 34.46% | 10.04% | 6.10% | 3.15% | 13.92% | 20.97% | 3.30% | -2.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSQ.DE and IGLN.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.04 |
The correlation between IUSQ.DE and IGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (10 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSQ.DE vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUSQ.DE
IGLN.L
IUSQ.DE vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSQ.DE | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.20 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 1.10 | +2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.29 | 3.40 | +12.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSQ.DE vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -36.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSQ.DE and IGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSQ.DE | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.60% | -36.94% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.48% | -22.28% | +15.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.25% | -22.28% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.25% | -22.28% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.60% | -22.28% | -11.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -19.59% | +18.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -13.17% | +8.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 7.18% | -5.60% |
Volatility
IUSQ.DE vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) is 3.41%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that IUSQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSQ.DE | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 7.27% | -3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 21.85% | -13.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 24.70% | -13.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 16.91% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 15.22% | -0.19% |
IUSQ.DE vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSQ.DE vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSQ.DE nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSQ.DE and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
IUSQ.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while IGLN.L is Gold. IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI), while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSQ.DE and 0.12% for IGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for IUSQ.DE and IGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer