IUSK.DE vs. AMED.DE
IUSK.DE (iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - IUSK.DE tracks the MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSK.DE returned 7.86%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSK.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
IUSK.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSK.DE achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSK.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 7.86%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
IUSK.DE
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
IUSK.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSK.DE iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 6.53% | 3.95% | 5.36% | 16.45% | -15.18% | 26.73% | 4.02% | 30.88% | -7.69% | 11.41% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSK.DE and AMED.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2011 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IUSK.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSK.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IUSK.DE
AMED.DE
IUSK.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSK.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUSK.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.33 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 2.49 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 9.40 | -8.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUSK.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 1.74 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.65 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.57 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
IUSK.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSK.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.56%, smaller than the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSK.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSK.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.56% | -38.35% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.12% | -10.56% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.94% | -14.07% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.50% | -24.06% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -38.35% | +4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.17% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.91% | -6.69% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 2.81% | +1.02% |
Volatility
IUSK.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSK.DE) is 4.24%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that IUSK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSK.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 5.61% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 12.64% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 15.19% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 15.87% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 17.00% | -1.50% |
IUSK.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSK.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSK.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSK.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSK.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUSK.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUSK.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
IUSK.DE tracks MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSK.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for IUSK.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer