IUSB vs. MINT
IUSB (iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. IUSB is passively managed, while MINT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSB returned 1.97%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for MINT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUSB charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.
Performance
IUSB vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSB achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSB has underperformed MINT with an annualized return of 1.97%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.72% annualized return.
IUSB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 5.21%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
MINT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
IUSB vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 0.67% | 7.38% | 2.11% | 6.23% | -13.04% | -1.33% | 7.62% | 9.13% | -0.27% | 3.82% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.94% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSB and MINT is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.23 |
The correlation between IUSB and MINT shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSB vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
IUSB
MINT
IUSB vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSB | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -64.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 21.62 | -20.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 95.35 | -93.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 965.15 | -959.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSB vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSB drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSB and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSB | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -4.62% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -0.05% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.82% | -0.16% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -2.42% | -15.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.90% | -4.62% | -13.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | 0.00% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -0.17% | -3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.00% | +0.86% |
Volatility
IUSB vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that IUSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSB | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 0.09% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 0.20% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.59% | 0.27% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.80% | 0.58% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 0.95% | +4.09% |
IUSB vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSB vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
IUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 4.22% | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.68% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSB and MINT have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IUSB has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSB dropped -17.90% vs MINT's -4.62%.
On 10-year performance, MINT leads with 2.72% vs 1.97% for IUSB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MINT has performed better with a 2.72% return vs 1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.
MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 4.22% for IUSB.
IUSB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IUSB and 0.36% for MINT.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.51 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSB and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer