IUSB vs. MAMB
IUSB (iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF) and MAMB (Monarch Ambassador Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - IUSB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index while MAMB tracks the Monarch Ambassador Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUSB returned 0.44%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for MAMB. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSB charges 0.06%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for MAMB.
Performance
IUSB vs. MAMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than MAMB's 2.01% return.
IUSB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
MAMB
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSB vs. MAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 0.43% | 7.38% | 2.11% | 6.23% | -13.04% | 1.48% |
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF | 2.01% | 10.69% | 1.32% | 4.90% | -13.02% | 1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSB and MAMB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IUSB and MAMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUSB vs. MAMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSB
MAMB
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
IUSB
MAMB
-
Basic Materials
IUSB
-
MAMB
-
Communication Services
IUSB
-
MAMB
Consumer Cyclical
IUSB
-
MAMB
Consumer Defensive
IUSB
-
MAMB
-
Financial Services
IUSB
-
MAMB
Healthcare
IUSB
-
MAMB
Industrials
IUSB
-
MAMB
Real Estate
IUSB
-
MAMB
-
Technology
IUSB
-
MAMB
-
Utilities
IUSB
-
MAMB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSB vs. MAMB — Risk / Return Rank
IUSB
MAMB
IUSB vs. MAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUSB | MAMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.65 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 7.49 | -0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUSB | MAMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.66 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.10 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.16 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
IUSB vs. MAMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSB drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum MAMB drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSB and MAMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSB | MAMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -19.33% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -3.55% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.82% | -7.38% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -19.33% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.65% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -7.50% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 1.25% | -0.42% |
Volatility
IUSB vs. MAMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) is 1.24%, while Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that IUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSB | MAMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.72% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 4.21% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.62% | 5.67% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 6.99% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 6.91% | -1.87% |
IUSB vs. MAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MAMB's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSB vs. MAMB - Dividend Comparison
IUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than MAMB's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 4.23% | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.68% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% |
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF | 2.44% | 2.47% | 2.11% | 1.73% | 0.92% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSB and MAMB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAMB has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to IUSB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSB dropped -17.90% vs MAMB's -19.33%.
On 5-year performance, MAMB leads with 0.72% vs 0.44% for IUSB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IUSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MAMB has performed better with a 0.72% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for MAMB.
IUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.44% for MAMB.
IUSB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index, while MAMB tracks Monarch Ambassador Income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Monarch. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IUSB and 1.49% for MAMB.
MAMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSB and MAMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer