IUSB vs. JCPB
IUSB (iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF) and JCPB (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. IUSB is passively managed, while JCPB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUSB returned 0.44%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for JCPB. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSB charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for JCPB.
Performance
IUSB vs. JCPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than JCPB's 0.58% return.
IUSB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
JCPB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSB vs. JCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 0.43% | 7.38% | 2.11% | 6.23% | -13.04% | -1.33% | 7.62% | 8.24% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.58% | 7.98% | 2.96% | 7.13% | -12.90% | -0.51% | 9.19% | 7.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSB and JCPB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IUSB and JCPB shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUSB vs. JCPB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSB
JCPB
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
IUSB
JCPB
Basic Materials
IUSB
-
JCPB
Communication Services
IUSB
-
JCPB
Consumer Cyclical
IUSB
-
JCPB
Consumer Defensive
IUSB
-
JCPB
Financial Services
IUSB
-
JCPB
Healthcare
IUSB
-
JCPB
Industrials
IUSB
-
JCPB
Real Estate
IUSB
-
JCPB
Technology
IUSB
-
JCPB
Utilities
IUSB
-
JCPB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSB vs. JCPB — Risk / Return Rank
IUSB
JCPB
IUSB vs. JCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUSB | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.26 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 6.88 | -0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUSB | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.63 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.21 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.55 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
IUSB vs. JCPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSB drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, which is greater than JCPB's maximum drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSB and JCPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSB | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -16.67% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -2.71% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.82% | -5.97% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -16.67% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.48% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -4.26% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.89% | -0.06% |
Volatility
IUSB vs. JCPB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) have volatilities of 1.24% and 1.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSB | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.26% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 2.72% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.62% | 3.77% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 5.38% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 5.05% | -0.01% |
IUSB vs. JCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than JCPB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSB vs. JCPB - Dividend Comparison
IUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than JCPB's 4.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 4.23% | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.68% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.93% | 4.90% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.97% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, IUSB and JCPB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JCPB has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to IUSB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSB dropped -17.90% vs JCPB's -16.67%.
On 5-year performance, JCPB leads with 1.11% vs 0.44% for IUSB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JCPB has performed better with a 1.11% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.
JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 4.23% for IUSB.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IUSB and 0.38% for JCPB.
JCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSB and JCPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer