PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCPB vs. BBAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCPB vs. BBAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPB achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than BBAG's -0.66% return.


JCPB

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.44%
YTD
-0.11%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
5.02%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.61%

BBAG

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.27%
6M
-0.87%
YTD
-0.66%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.14M$3.37M$5.23M
$69.07M$70.96M$101.73M

JCPB vs. BBAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
-0.11%7.98%2.96%7.13%-12.90%-0.51%9.19%7.76%
BBAG
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.66%7.27%1.26%5.41%-13.26%-1.79%7.31%7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPB and BBAG is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019

0.84

The correlation between JCPB and BBAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.97 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCPB vs. BBAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JCPB
JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BBAG
BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JCPB vs. BBAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JCPBBBAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.12

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

0.97

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

2.37

+1.06

JCPB vs. BBAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPB Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the BBAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPB and BBAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JCPB vs. BBAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum BBAG drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPB and BBAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCPBBBAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-18.73%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.78%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.94%

-5.10%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-18.06%

+1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-3.65%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-6.15%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.13%

-0.08%

Volatility

JCPB vs. BBAG - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) at 0.88%. This indicates that JCPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCPBBBAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.88%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

3.01%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

3.85%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.40%

5.93%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

5.76%

-0.73%

JCPB vs. BBAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCPB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCPB vs. BBAG - Dividend Comparison

JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than BBAG's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBAG
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.05%4.29%4.25%3.60%2.23%1.44%2.26%2.92%0.16%
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
4.54%4.90%5.16%4.32%3.01%2.19%2.97%3.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, JCPB and BBAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JCPB has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to BBAG (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPB dropped -16.67% vs BBAG's -18.73%.

On 5-year performance, JCPB leads with 0.68% vs -0.52% for BBAG. On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JCPB has performed better with a 0.68% return vs -0.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.

JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 4.05% for BBAG.

JCPB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BBAG is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for JCPB and 0.03% for BBAG.

JCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCPB and BBAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer