IUSA.L vs. SPXD.L
IUSA.L (iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist) and SPXD.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUSA.L returned 15.33%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for SPXD.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXD.L.
Performance
IUSA.L vs. SPXD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUSA.L is traded in GBp, while SPXD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IUSA.L having a 10.67% return and SPXD.L slightly higher at 10.89%.
IUSA.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.52%
SPXD.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 10.89%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSA.L vs. SPXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSA.L iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist | 10.67% | 9.70% | 27.73% | 20.24% | -8.72% | 31.54% | 14.15% | 9.54% |
SPXD.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist | 10.85% | 9.16% | 27.77% | 20.57% | -8.81% | 30.89% | 14.44% | 8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSA.L and SPXD.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IUSA.L and SPXD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUSA.L vs. SPXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Financial Services
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Communication Services
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Healthcare
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Industrials
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Consumer Defensive
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Energy
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Utilities
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Real Estate
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Basic Materials
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSA.L vs. SPXD.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUSA.L
SPXD.L
IUSA.L vs. SPXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUSA.L | SPXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.45 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 4.02 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.53 | 13.73 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUSA.L | SPXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 2.46 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.99 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.92 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
IUSA.L vs. SPXD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, which is greater than SPXD.L's maximum drawdown of -26.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSA.L and SPXD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSA.L | SPXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.58% | -26.07% | -12.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -7.17% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.08% | -20.92% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -20.92% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.15% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -3.66% | -3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.11% | -0.21% |
Volatility
IUSA.L vs. SPXD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) is 2.62%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that IUSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSA.L | SPXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 3.41% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 8.47% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.44% | 11.71% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 15.31% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 17.09% | -1.49% |
IUSA.L vs. SPXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXD.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSA.L vs. SPXD.L - Dividend Comparison
IUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than SPXD.L's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSA.L iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist | 1.15% | 1.24% | 1.28% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 1.39% | 1.80% | 1.96% | 2.22% | 1.95% | 1.75% | 2.29% |
SPXD.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist | 1.08% | 1.16% | 1.31% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IUSA.L and SPXD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPXD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IUSA.L.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IUSA.L and 0.05% for SPXD.L.
Find the right allocation for IUSA.L and SPXD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer