PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS5.DE vs. AMEL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUS5.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS5.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUS5.DE achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than AMEL.DE's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, IUS5.DE has underperformed AMEL.DE with an annualized return of 0.80%, while AMEL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.43% annualized return.


IUS5.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.48%
YTD
2.13%
6M
1.40%
1Y
2.24%
3Y*
0.57%
5Y*
-1.37%
10Y*
0.80%

AMEL.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
-7.35%
YTD
10.83%
6M
10.61%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS5.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUS5.DE
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.13%-3.37%2.59%1.53%-17.29%12.12%2.24%10.07%0.53%-4.84%
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
10.83%38.06%-22.22%28.09%16.34%-3.21%-21.29%20.69%-3.27%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS5.DE and AMEL.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2011

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUS5.DE vs. AMEL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS5.DE
IUS5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IUS5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEL.DE
AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS5.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS5.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUS5.DEAMEL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.33

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

3.16

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

9.66

-7.99

IUS5.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS5.DE and AMEL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUS5.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

1.90

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.45

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.29

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.12

+0.30

Drawdowns

IUS5.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS5.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.31%, smaller than the maximum AMEL.DE drawdown of -52.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS5.DE and AMEL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUS5.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.31%

-52.69%

+30.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.31%

-10.86%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.42%

-25.38%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.31%

-25.38%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.31%

-51.31%

+29.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.45%

-10.86%

-6.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-17.89%

+10.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

3.57%

-2.36%

Volatility

IUS5.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS5.DE) is 1.90%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that IUS5.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUS5.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

5.32%

-3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.77%

15.30%

-11.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.02%

18.10%

-13.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

20.90%

-12.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.94%

25.27%

-17.33%

IUS5.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUS5.DE and AMEL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUS5.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUS5.DE nor AMEL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUS5.DE and AMEL.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUS5.DE and AMEL.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IUS5.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while AMEL.DE is Latin America Equities. IUS5.DE tracks Bloomberg World Government Inflation-Linked Bond, while AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUS5.DE and AMEL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer