PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUQD.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUQD.L is traded in USD, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUQD.L having a 10.23% return and FUQA.L slightly lower at 10.21%.


IUQD.L

1D
0.25%
1M
0.22%
6M
8.93%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
20.67%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*

FUQA.L

1D
0.87%
1M
1.55%
6M
9.85%
YTD
10.21%
1Y
21.39%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUQD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
10.23%12.64%22.37%30.89%-20.80%27.69%16.03%33.32%-6.89%
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
10.21%16.75%17.51%17.75%-10.69%26.66%11.54%32.33%-3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IUQD.L and FUQA.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2018

0.83

The correlation between IUQD.L and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUQD.L
FUQA.L

Technology

38.8%
35.3%

Communication Services

11.8%
9.6%

Financial Services

10.8%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.7%
9.8%

Industrials

7.2%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.8%

Energy

3.2%
3.1%

Utilities

2.1%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

IUQD.L
38.8%
FUQA.L
35.3%

Communication Services

IUQD.L
11.8%
FUQA.L
9.6%

Financial Services

IUQD.L
10.8%
FUQA.L
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IUQD.L
9.3%
FUQA.L
9.4%

Healthcare

IUQD.L
8.7%
FUQA.L
9.8%

Industrials

IUQD.L
7.2%
FUQA.L
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

IUQD.L
4.4%
FUQA.L
4.8%

Energy

IUQD.L
3.2%
FUQA.L
3.1%

Utilities

IUQD.L
2.1%
FUQA.L
2.1%

Basic Materials

IUQD.L
1.9%
FUQA.L
2.2%

Real Estate

IUQD.L
1.8%
FUQA.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUQD.L
IUQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IUQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IUQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FUQA.L
FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUQD.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUQD.LFUQA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.67

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

11.69

-0.78

IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUQD.L and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUQD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQD.L and FUQA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUQD.LFUQA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-35.38%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-7.97%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-19.14%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.75%

-20.19%

-7.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

0.00%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-6.77%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.83%

+0.06%

Volatility

IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUQD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that IUQD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUQD.LFUQA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.68%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

7.52%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

10.05%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

19.97%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.48%

23.00%

-5.52%

IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUQD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUQD.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

IUQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUQD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.66%0.73%0.84%1.05%1.34%0.95%1.21%1.32%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUQD.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUQD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUQD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUQA.L.

IUQD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQD.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUQD.L and FUQA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer