IUMS.L vs. 3USL.L
IUMS.L (iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and 3USL.L (WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Index NTR, while 3USL.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMS.L returned 4.91%/yr vs 22.25%/yr for 3USL.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUMS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3USL.L.
Performance
IUMS.L vs. 3USL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMS.L achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly lower than 3USL.L's 25.13% return.
IUMS.L
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 18.25%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- —
3USL.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 12.76%
- YTD
- 25.13%
- 6M
- 26.49%
- 1Y
- 77.77%
- 3Y*
- 50.50%
- 5Y*
- 22.25%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
IUMS.L vs. 3USL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMS.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.52% | 10.90% | -0.92% | 12.41% | -11.90% | 26.93% | 20.54% | 22.92% | -15.68% | 19.22% |
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 25.13% | 28.97% | 64.00% | 70.49% | -57.35% | 101.77% | 7.89% | 97.98% | -27.34% | 50.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMS.L and 3USL.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IUMS.L and 3USL.L has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IUMS.L vs. 3USL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUMS.L
3USL.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
IUMS.L
3USL.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUMS.L
3USL.L
Industrials
IUMS.L
3USL.L
Communication Services
IUMS.L
-
3USL.L
Consumer Defensive
IUMS.L
-
3USL.L
Energy
IUMS.L
-
3USL.L
Financial Services
IUMS.L
-
3USL.L
Healthcare
IUMS.L
-
3USL.L
Real Estate
IUMS.L
-
3USL.L
Technology
IUMS.L
-
3USL.L
Utilities
IUMS.L
-
3USL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUMS.L vs. 3USL.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMS.L
3USL.L
IUMS.L vs. 3USL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUMS.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 3.06 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 12.28 | -7.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUMS.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 2.25 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.47 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.60 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
IUMS.L vs. 3USL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMS.L drawdown since its inception was -35.81%, smaller than the maximum 3USL.L drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMS.L and 3USL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMS.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.81% | -76.72% | +40.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -25.29% | +13.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.80% | -48.69% | +25.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.24% | -63.47% | +38.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -1.82% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -15.26% | +8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 6.31% | -2.44% |
Volatility
IUMS.L vs. 3USL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L) is 6.12%, while WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that IUMS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3USL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUMS.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 9.42% | -3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 25.26% | -11.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 34.36% | -17.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 47.39% | -28.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 48.51% | -28.44% |
IUMS.L vs. 3USL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUMS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 3USL.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUMS.L vs. 3USL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUMS.L nor 3USL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUMS.L and 3USL.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUMS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUMS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.
IUMS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while 3USL.L is Leveraged Equities. IUMS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Index NTR, while 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUMS.L and 0.75% for 3USL.L.
Find the right allocation for IUMS.L and 3USL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer