PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IUMF.L vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IUMF.L vs. MTUM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IUMF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds from iShares - IUMF.L tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Index while MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMF.L returned 15.33%/yr vs 16.20%/yr for MTUM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUMF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.

Performance

IUMF.L vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUMF.L is traded in GBp, while MTUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MTUM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IUMF.L having a 29.89% return and MTUM slightly higher at 30.83%.

IUMF.L

1D
-1.75%
1M
13.21%
YTD
29.89%
6M
29.09%
1Y
40.90%
3Y*
28.84%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
—

MTUM

1D
-1.10%
1M
12.97%
YTD
30.83%
6M
29.09%
1Y
41.91%
3Y*
30.97%
5Y*
16.20%
10Y*
18.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMF.L vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUMF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF		29.89%9.14%34.88%3.73%-8.43%14.11%25.03%23.31%2.39%24.77%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF		30.83%13.45%35.21%3.69%-8.55%14.43%26.05%22.41%4.16%25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMF.L and MTUM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016

0.63

The correlation between IUMF.L and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUMF.L vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IUMF.L
MTUM

Technology

42.9%
44.4%

Industrials

19.2%
15.6%

Healthcare

9.6%
6.9%

Financial Services

7.3%
10.4%

Communication Services

6.7%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
3.6%

Energy

2.5%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
3.3%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.7%

Utilities

1.5%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Technology

IUMF.L
42.9%
MTUM
44.4%

Industrials

IUMF.L
19.2%
MTUM
15.6%

Healthcare

IUMF.L
9.6%
MTUM
6.9%

Financial Services

IUMF.L
7.3%
MTUM
10.4%

Communication Services

IUMF.L
6.7%
MTUM
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IUMF.L
5.1%
MTUM
3.6%

Energy

IUMF.L
2.5%
MTUM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

IUMF.L
2.2%
MTUM
3.3%

Basic Materials

IUMF.L
1.9%
MTUM
1.7%

Utilities

IUMF.L
1.5%
MTUM
1.6%

Real Estate

IUMF.L
1.1%
MTUM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

Often compared with IUMF.L:
IUMF.L vs. IWFM.LIUMF.L vs. XDEM.LIUMF.L vs. JPLG.LIUMF.L vs. FSUS.LIUMF.L vs. IUMD.LIUMF.L vs. JMOMIUMF.L vs. QQQ
Often compared with MTUM:
MTUM vs. SPMOMTUM vs. SPYMTUM vs. QQQMTUM vs. QUALMTUM vs. VOOMTUM vs. VFMOMTUM vs. QMOM

Return for Risk

IUMF.L vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IUMF.L
IUMF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMF.L vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IUMF.LMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.26
2.33

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.19
3.05

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

4.15

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

13.69

+0.41

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUMF.L vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMF.L and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IUMF.LMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.33

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.82

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.85

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.88

-0.03

Drawdowns

IUMF.L vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -26.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMF.L and MTUM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IUMF.LMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.23%

-26.19%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-10.16%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-23.26%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

-24.92%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-26.19%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-1.10%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-5.43%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.07%

-0.18%

Volatility

IUMF.L vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) at 7.17%. This indicates that IUMF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IUMF.LMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

7.17%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.09%

15.08%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.99%

18.05%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

19.74%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

21.22%

-2.56%

IUMF.L vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IUMF.L vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

IUMF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUMF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF		0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

IUMF.L and MTUM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUMF.L.

IUMF.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMF.L and 0.15% for MTUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUMF.L and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer