IUMD.L vs. NASL.L
IUMD.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and NASL.L (Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMD.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while NASL.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMD.L returned 14.09%/yr vs 17.80%/yr for NASL.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUMD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NASL.L.
Performance
IUMD.L vs. NASL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUMD.L is traded in USD, while NASL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NASL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMD.L achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly higher than NASL.L's 19.63% return.
IUMD.L
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 11.97%
- YTD
- 29.46%
- 6M
- 29.72%
- 1Y
- 39.40%
- 3Y*
- 32.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
NASL.L
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 19.63%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 40.52%
- 3Y*
- 28.11%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- —
IUMD.L vs. NASL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMD.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 29.46% | 17.13% | 32.70% | 9.78% | -18.13% | 12.60% | 29.52% | 27.26% | -9.73% |
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 19.63% | 20.14% | 26.63% | 55.75% | -33.36% | 28.60% | 47.82% | 39.07% | -8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMD.L and NASL.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IUMD.L and NASL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUMD.L vs. NASL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Industrials
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Healthcare
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Financial Services
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Communication Services
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Energy
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Consumer Defensive
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Basic Materials
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Utilities
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Real Estate
IUMD.L
NASL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUMD.L vs. NASL.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMD.L
NASL.L
IUMD.L vs. NASL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) and Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUMD.L | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 3.57 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.47 | 13.27 | +1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUMD.L | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.65 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.87 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.99 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
IUMD.L vs. NASL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, roughly equal to the maximum NASL.L drawdown of -35.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMD.L and NASL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMD.L | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.67% | -35.11% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -11.31% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.57% | -23.08% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.87% | -35.11% | +3.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -0.75% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.75% | -7.25% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 3.04% | -0.33% |
Volatility
IUMD.L vs. NASL.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) at 4.35%. This indicates that IUMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NASL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUMD.L | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 4.35% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.78% | 11.14% | +5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.45% | 15.23% | +4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 20.36% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 20.90% | -0.43% |
IUMD.L vs. NASL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUMD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NASL.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUMD.L vs. NASL.L - Dividend Comparison
IUMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while NASL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMD.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.67% | 0.87% | 0.50% | 1.14% | 1.41% | 0.40% | 0.67% | 1.13% | 0.85% |
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUMD.L and NASL.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUMD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUMD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NASL.L.
IUMD.L is categorized as Momentum, while NASL.L is Nasdaq-100. IUMD.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while NASL.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMD.L and 0.30% for NASL.L.
Find the right allocation for IUMD.L and NASL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer