IUIT.L vs. XDWH.L
IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUIT.L returned 26.35%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for XDWH.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUIT.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.
Performance
IUIT.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUIT.L achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IUIT.L has outperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 26.35%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.
IUIT.L
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- 14.90%
- 6M
- 14.66%
- 1Y
- 35.71%
- 3Y*
- 30.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.47%
- 10Y*
- 26.35%
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 15.69%
- 3Y*
- 6.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
IUIT.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 14.90% | 22.93% | 38.51% | 59.45% | -29.15% | 34.09% | 43.14% | 48.83% | -1.41% | 37.94% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.36% | 15.25% | 0.75% | 3.81% | -5.42% | 20.56% | 12.88% | 22.95% | 2.11% | 19.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUIT.L and XDWH.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.51 |
The correlation between IUIT.L and XDWH.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUIT.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUIT.L
XDWH.L
Technology
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IUIT.L
XDWH.L
-
Energy
IUIT.L
XDWH.L
-
Industrials
IUIT.L
XDWH.L
-
Basic Materials
IUIT.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Communication Services
IUIT.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IUIT.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IUIT.L
-
XDWH.L
Financial Services
IUIT.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Healthcare
IUIT.L
-
XDWH.L
Real Estate
IUIT.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Utilities
IUIT.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUIT.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUIT.L
XDWH.L
IUIT.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUIT.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.19 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 1.50 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | 3.65 | +2.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUIT.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUIT.L drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIT.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUIT.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -26.24% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.03% | -10.39% | -6.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.40% | -19.27% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.46% | -19.27% | -14.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.46% | -26.24% | -7.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.55% | -2.82% | -6.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -4.80% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 4.28% | +1.77% |
Volatility
IUIT.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) at 5.41%. This indicates that IUIT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUIT.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 5.41% | +3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.95% | 11.12% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.42% | 14.87% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 14.24% | +9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 14.96% | +7.33% |
IUIT.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUIT.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUIT.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUIT.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUIT.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.L.
IUIT.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUIT.L and 0.25% for XDWH.L.
Find the right allocation for IUIT.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer