IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XLVP.L (Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IUHC.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index while XLVP.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUHC.L returned 9.20%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for XLVP.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUHC.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLVP.L.

Performance

IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IUHC.L is traded in USD, while XLVP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLVP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IUHC.L having a -2.09% return and XLVP.L slightly higher at -2.08%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUHC.L having a 9.20% annualized return and XLVP.L not far behind at 9.19%.

IUHC.L

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 4.72%
• YTD: -2.09%
• 6M: -0.45%
• 1Y: 15.03%
• 3Y*: 6.58%
• 5Y*: 5.75%
• 10Y*: 9.20%

XLVP.L

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: -2.08%
• 6M: -0.40%
• 1Y: 15.22%
• 3Y*: 6.48%
• 5Y*: 5.77%
• 10Y*: 9.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-2.09%	14.67%	2.16%	1.72%	-2.63%	27.58%	11.93%	20.60%	4.44%	22.21%
XLVP.L Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF	-2.08%	14.98%	2.05%	1.20%	-2.68%	27.97%	11.54%	21.48%	4.05%	21.56%

Correlation

The correlation between IUHC.L and XLVP.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015	0.92

The correlation between IUHC.L and XLVP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUHC.L	XLVP.L
Healthcare	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUHC.L

IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

XLVP.L

XLVP.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
XLVP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XLVP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XLVP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
XLVP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IUHC.L	XLVP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.02	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	1.60	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.18	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	1.45	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.57	3.58	-0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUHC.L and XLVP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IUHC.L	XLVP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	1.02	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.39	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.58	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.58	-0.02

Drawdowns

IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, roughly equal to the maximum XLVP.L drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and XLVP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUHC.L	XLVP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.44%	-26.93%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.44%	-10.44%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.63%	-17.66%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.63%	-17.66%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.44%	-26.93%	-0.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.57%	-4.58%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-5.02%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.20%	4.25%	-0.05%

Volatility

IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) have volatilities of 4.89% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUHC.L	XLVP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	4.90%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.81%	10.72%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.00%	14.93%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.82%	14.74%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.71%	15.76%	-0.05%

IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUHC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IUHC.L vs. XLVP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUHC.L nor XLVP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUHC.L and XLVP.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, IUHC.L and XLVP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, IUHC.L or XLVP.L?

On fees, XLVP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUHC.L or XLVP.L?

XLVP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUHC.L.

What is the main difference between IUHC.L and XLVP.L?

IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while XLVP.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUHC.L and 0.14% for XLVP.L.