PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUFS.L vs. WFIN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUFS.L vs. WFIN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WFIN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUFS.L achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly lower than WFIN.L's 8.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUFS.L having a 13.14% annualized return and WFIN.L not far ahead at 13.38%.


IUFS.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
3.53%
6M
4.49%
YTD
3.27%
1Y
9.63%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
13.14%

WFIN.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
3.52%
6M
8.38%
YTD
8.69%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
24.36%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUFS.L vs. WFIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUFS.L
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
3.27%15.05%30.22%12.12%-11.06%36.31%-3.28%31.05%-14.32%22.99%
WFIN.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.69%29.17%26.82%16.20%-9.85%28.37%-2.96%24.94%-17.34%23.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IUFS.L and WFIN.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.91

The correlation between IUFS.L and WFIN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUFS.L vs. WFIN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUFS.L
IUFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IUFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

WFIN.L
WFIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
WFIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUFS.L vs. WFIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WFIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUFS.LWFIN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.25

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

1.86

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

6.13

-4.42

IUFS.L vs. WFIN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUFS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the WFIN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUFS.L and WFIN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUFS.L vs. WFIN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUFS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, smaller than the maximum WFIN.L drawdown of -72.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUFS.L and WFIN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUFS.LWFIN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-72.88%

+29.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-11.06%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.59%

-15.69%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-27.48%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

-43.40%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.62%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-18.22%

+10.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

3.36%

+2.27%

Volatility

IUFS.L vs. WFIN.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WFIN.L) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUFS.LWFIN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.77%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

11.97%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

14.60%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

17.84%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

18.87%

+2.14%

IUFS.L vs. WFIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUFS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WFIN.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUFS.L vs. WFIN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUFS.L nor WFIN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IUFS.L and WFIN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IUFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WFIN.L.

IUFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while WFIN.L tracks MSCI World Financials 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUFS.L and 0.30% for WFIN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUFS.L and WFIN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer