PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFIN.L vs. BNKS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFIN.L vs. BNKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc (WFIN.L) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFIN.L achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than BNKS.L's 13.36% return.


WFIN.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.66%
6M
9.60%
YTD
8.91%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
24.93%
5Y*
14.81%
10Y*
13.34%

BNKS.L

1D
0.81%
1M
4.92%
6M
13.65%
YTD
13.36%
1Y
26.48%
3Y*
27.77%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFIN.L vs. BNKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WFIN.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc
8.91%29.17%26.82%16.20%-9.85%28.37%-2.96%24.94%-16.77%
BNKS.L
iShares S&P U.S. Banks
13.36%20.47%27.74%-3.09%-18.79%39.71%-11.77%33.02%-23.57%

Correlation

The correlation between WFIN.L and BNKS.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.85

The correlation between WFIN.L and BNKS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFIN.L vs. BNKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFIN.L
WFIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
WFIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BNKS.L
BNKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFIN.L vs. BNKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc (WFIN.L) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WFIN.LBNKS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.22

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.56

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

4.30

+2.23

WFIN.L vs. BNKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFIN.L and BNKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WFIN.L vs. BNKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFIN.L drawdown since its inception was -72.88%, which is greater than BNKS.L's maximum drawdown of -51.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIN.L and BNKS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFIN.LBNKS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.88%

-51.35%

-21.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-16.90%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.69%

-28.47%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.48%

-50.15%

+22.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

0.00%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.23%

-17.10%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

6.14%

-2.78%

Volatility

WFIN.L vs. BNKS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc (WFIN.L) is 3.95%, while iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that WFIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFIN.LBNKS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

5.62%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

16.10%

-4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

20.77%

-6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

27.79%

-9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

30.64%

-11.77%

WFIN.L vs. BNKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFIN.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFIN.L vs. BNKS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WFIN.L nor BNKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WFIN.L and BNKS.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WFIN.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WFIN.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BNKS.L.

WFIN.L tracks State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc, while BNKS.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WFIN.L and 0.35% for BNKS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFIN.L and BNKS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer