IUCB.L vs. XZBU.L
IUCB.L (SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and XZBU.L (Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C) are both Corporate Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, from State Street and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUCB.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XZBU.L.
Performance
IUCB.L vs. XZBU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUCB.L is traded in USD, while XZBU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XZBU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
IUCB.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- —
XZBU.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUCB.L vs. XZBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUCB.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.43% | 7.84% | 4.54% | 7.17% | -9.26% | -1.61% | 1.96% |
XZBU.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C | 34.79% | 8.26% | 0.97% | 8.41% | -18.49% | -1.77% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUCB.L and XZBU.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between IUCB.L and XZBU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUCB.L vs. XZBU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUCB.L
XZBU.L
IUCB.L vs. XZBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IUCB.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUCB.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUCB.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | — | — |
Drawdowns
IUCB.L vs. XZBU.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUCB.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | — | — |
Volatility
IUCB.L vs. XZBU.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUCB.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.24% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.66% | — | — |
IUCB.L vs. XZBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUCB.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XZBU.L's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUCB.L vs. XZBU.L - Dividend Comparison
IUCB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while XZBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUCB.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.67% | 4.66% | 4.70% | 3.89% | 2.62% | 2.37% | 2.67% |
XZBU.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUCB.L and XZBU.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUCB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUCB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XZBU.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IUCB.L and 0.16% for XZBU.L.
Find the right allocation for IUCB.L and XZBU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer