ITWO vs. ACYS

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ITWO (Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ITWO is passively managed, while ACYS is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITWO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.

Performance

ITWO vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ITWO

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: 14.35%
• YTD: 21.78%
• 1Y: 35.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACYS

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.90%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITWO vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF	7.80%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ITWO and ACYS is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	0.36

Return for Risk

ITWO vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITWO

ITWO Risk / Return Rank: 75
ITWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ITWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ITWO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ITWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ITWO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ACYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITWO vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ITWO	ACYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.28	—	—

Drawdowns

ITWO vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITWO drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITWO and ACYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITWO	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.77%	-0.63%	-24.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-0.05%	-1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-0.14%	-4.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ITWO	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.99%	3.44%	+15.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.38%	3.44%	+16.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.38%	3.44%	+16.94%

ITWO vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITWO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITWO vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

ITWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF	7.24%	12.12%	4.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITWO and ACYS in my portfolio?

ITWO and ACYS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ITWO or ACYS?

On fees, ITWO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITWO or ACYS?

ITWO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITWO or ACYS?

ITWO has the higher dividend yield at 7.24%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between ITWO and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ITWO and 0.75% for ACYS.