ITWN.L vs. ESPS.L
ITWN.L (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and ESPS.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - ITWN.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD while ESPS.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITWN.L returned 22.94%/yr vs 6.05%/yr for ESPS.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITWN.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ESPS.L.
Performance
ITWN.L vs. ESPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITWN.L achieves a 67.93% return, which is significantly higher than ESPS.L's 6.57% return.
ITWN.L
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 14.84%
- YTD
- 67.93%
- 6M
- 73.48%
- 1Y
- 117.37%
- 3Y*
- 40.47%
- 5Y*
- 22.94%
- 10Y*
- 23.12%
ESPS.L
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 14.60%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- —
ITWN.L vs. ESPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITWN.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 67.93% | 22.61% | 25.77% | 21.84% | -21.08% | 17.76% |
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 6.57% | 10.52% | 7.35% | 2.26% | 1.34% | 5.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITWN.L and ESPS.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.27 |
The correlation between ITWN.L and ESPS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITWN.L vs. ESPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITWN.L
ESPS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ITWN.L
ESPS.L
Financial Services
ITWN.L
ESPS.L
Industrials
ITWN.L
ESPS.L
Basic Materials
ITWN.L
ESPS.L
Communication Services
ITWN.L
ESPS.L
Consumer Cyclical
ITWN.L
ESPS.L
Consumer Defensive
ITWN.L
ESPS.L
Healthcare
ITWN.L
ESPS.L
Energy
ITWN.L
-
ESPS.L
Real Estate
ITWN.L
-
ESPS.L
Utilities
ITWN.L
-
ESPS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITWN.L vs. ESPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ITWN.L
ESPS.L
ITWN.L vs. ESPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITWN.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.24 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 1.93 | +10.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.79 | 5.53 | +29.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITWN.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.10 | 1.34 | +3.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.59 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.66 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
ITWN.L vs. ESPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITWN.L drawdown since its inception was -48.27%, which is greater than ESPS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITWN.L and ESPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITWN.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.27% | -17.76% | -30.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -7.52% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.32% | -17.76% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.07% | -17.76% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -4.04% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -4.55% | -4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.63% | +0.73% |
Volatility
ITWN.L vs. ESPS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) at 3.56%. This indicates that ITWN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITWN.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | 3.56% | +6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.60% | 8.36% | +10.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.88% | 10.84% | +12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 18.86% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 18.86% | +1.69% |
ITWN.L vs. ESPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITWN.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPS.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITWN.L vs. ESPS.L - Dividend Comparison
ITWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while ESPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITWN.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.50% | 1.37% | 2.14% | 3.54% | 1.33% | 1.83% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.74% | 2.86% | 3.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITWN.L and ESPS.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESPS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESPS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ITWN.L.
ITWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while ESPS.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ITWN.L and 0.19% for ESPS.L.
Find the right allocation for ITWN.L and ESPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer