ITRG vs. BWMN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ITRG (Integra Resources Corp) and BWMN (Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.) are both stocks. ITRG operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while BWMN operates in Consulting Services (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, ITRG returned -21.18%/yr vs 18.13%/yr for BWMN. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ITRG vs. BWMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Integra Resources Corp (ITRG) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITRG achieves a -37.41% return, which is significantly lower than BWMN's -3.88% return.

ITRG

• 1D: -3.09%
• 1M: -7.72%
• YTD: -37.41%
• 6M: -31.04%
• 1Y: 46.78%
• 3Y*: 31.26%
• 5Y*: -21.18%
• 10Y*: —

BWMN

• 1D: -2.40%
• 1M: -2.25%
• YTD: -3.88%
• 6M: -9.70%
• 1Y: 24.28%
• 3Y*: 4.16%
• 5Y*: 18.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITRG vs. BWMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ITRG Integra Resources Corp	-37.41%	360.97%	-17.93%	-33.03%	-70.55%	-31.31%
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.	-3.88%	32.34%	-29.76%	62.56%	2.85%	51.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ITRG and BWMN is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021	0.13

The correlation between ITRG and BWMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (5 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ITRG : $513.49M BWMN : $522.23M
EPS ITRG : $0.05 BWMN : $0.64
PE Ratio ITRG : 50.32 BWMN : 49.97
PS Ratio ITRG : 1.86 BWMN : 1.40
PB Ratio ITRG : 1.99 BWMN : 2.08
Total Revenue (TTM) ITRG : $247.79M BWMN : $377.09M
Gross Profit (TTM) ITRG : $85.71M BWMN : $175.89M
EBITDA (TTM) ITRG : $71.00M BWMN : $42.71M

Return for Risk

ITRG vs. BWMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITRG

ITRG Risk / Return Rank: 62
ITRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ITRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
ITRG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ITRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ITRG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

BWMN

BWMN Risk / Return Rank: 55
BWMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BWMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
BWMN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BWMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BWMN Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITRG vs. BWMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Integra Resources Corp (ITRG) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITRG	BWMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.53	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	0.95	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.14	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	0.61	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.11	1.21	+0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ITRG vs. BWMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITRG Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the BWMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITRG and BWMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITRG	BWMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	0.53	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.34	0.38	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.34	0.37	-0.71

Drawdowns

ITRG vs. BWMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITRG drawdown since its inception was -93.85%, which is greater than BWMN's maximum drawdown of -56.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITRG and BWMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITRG	BWMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.85%	-56.21%	-37.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.84%	-39.93%	-7.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.84%	-56.21%	+8.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.79%	-56.21%	-35.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.69%	-28.56%	-49.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.55%	-20.65%	-49.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.21%	20.11%	+2.10%

Volatility

ITRG vs. BWMN - Volatility Comparison

Integra Resources Corp (ITRG) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) at 12.47%. This indicates that ITRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITRG	BWMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.28%	12.47%	+4.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.00%	31.36%	+14.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.92%	45.86%	+19.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.25%	47.34%	+14.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.45%	47.03%	+13.42%

Dividends

ITRG vs. BWMN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ITRG nor BWMN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITRG and BWMN in my portfolio?

ITRG and BWMN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ITRG or BWMN?

ITRG has higher volatility (17.28%) compared to BWMN (12.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITRG dropped -93.85% vs BWMN's -56.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ITRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.