ITOT vs. SCHQ
ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index, while SCHQ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITOT returned 12.18%/yr vs -5.35%/yr for SCHQ. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
ITOT vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's -0.75% return.
ITOT
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 24.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.67%
SCHQ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- -0.91%
- 5Y*
- -5.35%
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 8.76% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 10.52% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.75% | 5.50% | -6.44% | 3.43% | -29.44% | -4.86% | 17.73% | -4.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOT and SCHQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | -0.02 |
The correlation between ITOT and SCHQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITOT vs. SCHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITOT
SCHQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
ITOT
SCHQ
Financial Services
ITOT
SCHQ
Communication Services
ITOT
SCHQ
Consumer Cyclical
ITOT
SCHQ
-
Industrials
ITOT
SCHQ
-
Healthcare
ITOT
SCHQ
-
Consumer Defensive
ITOT
SCHQ
-
Energy
ITOT
SCHQ
-
Real Estate
ITOT
SCHQ
-
Utilities
ITOT
SCHQ
-
Basic Materials
ITOT
SCHQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITOT vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank
ITOT
SCHQ
ITOT vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITOT | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.07 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 0.48 | +2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.34 | 1.23 | +12.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITOT | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 0.38 | +1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | -0.37 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | -0.25 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
ITOT vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than SCHQ's maximum drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and SCHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITOT | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.20% | -46.13% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -7.01% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -17.65% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -40.93% | +15.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -37.02% | +34.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -26.37% | +19.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.72% | -0.78% |
Volatility
ITOT vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) at 2.49%. This indicates that ITOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITOT | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 2.49% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 5.97% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 8.82% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 14.52% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 15.33% | +2.95% |
ITOT vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ITOT and SCHQ have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITOT vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison
ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than SCHQ's 4.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.81% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITOT and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITOT has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to SCHQ (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.
On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 12.18% vs -5.35% for SCHQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 12.18% return vs -5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT and SCHQ have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 1.00% for ITOT.
ITOT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHQ is Government Bonds. ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITOT and SCHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer