ITOT vs. FSPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).
ITOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Jan 20, 2004. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
ITOT vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ITOT vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | -3.15% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 20.36% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | -8.99% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -1.79% | 27.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -8.99% return.
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -3.15%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
FSPGX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- -8.99%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITOT vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ITOT vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
ITOT
FSPGX
ITOT vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITOT | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.84 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.36 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 1.22 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.10 | 4.16 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITOT | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.84 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.59 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.80 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOT and FSPGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ITOT vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than FSPGX's 0.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.12% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.38% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ITOT vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and FSPGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITOT | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.20% | -32.66% | -22.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -16.17% | +7.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -32.66% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.36% | -12.28% | +6.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -6.43% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.77% | -2.14% |
Volatility
ITOT vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) is 5.43%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that ITOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ITOT | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 6.79% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 12.40% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.68% | 22.60% | -3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 21.51% | -4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 21.66% | -3.42% |