ITEQ vs. TRUT
ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ITEQ is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
ITEQ vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 17.19% return, which is significantly lower than TRUT's 25.30% return.
ITEQ
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITEQ vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 17.19% | 10.18% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEQ and TRUT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITEQ vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
ITEQ
TRUT
ITEQ vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITEQ | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITEQ | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 2.39 | -1.96 |
Drawdowns
ITEQ vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEQ | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -18.55% | -36.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.17% | -1.46% | -11.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -5.17% | -13.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | — | — |
Volatility
ITEQ vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITEQ | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.77% | 21.53% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 21.53% | +3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 21.53% | +1.87% |
ITEQ vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITEQ vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.72% | 0.85% | 0.01% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITEQ and TRUT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.
ITEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.
They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ITEQ and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for ITEQ and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer