ITEQ vs. OILK
ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITEQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITEQ returned 0.67%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
ITEQ vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 17.19% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
ITEQ
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
ITEQ vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 17.19% | 13.71% | 11.70% | 4.70% | -30.36% | -8.04% | 58.96% | 37.59% | -0.63% | 26.87% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEQ and OILK is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.13 |
The correlation between ITEQ and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITEQ vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITEQ
OILK
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
ITEQ
OILK
-
Industrials
ITEQ
OILK
-
Utilities
ITEQ
OILK
-
Financial Services
ITEQ
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITEQ
OILK
Healthcare
ITEQ
OILK
-
Energy
ITEQ
OILK
-
Communication Services
ITEQ
OILK
-
Basic Materials
ITEQ
-
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
ITEQ
-
OILK
-
Real Estate
ITEQ
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITEQ vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
ITEQ
OILK
ITEQ vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITEQ | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 3.42 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | 6.91 | -1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITEQ | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.06 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.59 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.12 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
ITEQ vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEQ | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -83.76% | +29.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -17.35% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.78% | -23.42% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.29% | -34.69% | -15.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.17% | -3.66% | -9.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -32.61% | +14.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 8.56% | -3.70% |
Volatility
ITEQ vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) is 7.71%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that ITEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITEQ | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 10.44% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 23.26% | -5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.77% | 28.75% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 30.12% | -5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 35.97% | -12.57% |
ITEQ vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITEQ vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.72% | 0.85% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITEQ and OILK have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to ITEQ (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 0.67% for ITEQ. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 0.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.72% for ITEQ.
ITEQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ITEQ and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITEQ and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer