PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITEQ vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITEQ vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 22.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 9.84%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 23.79% annualized return.


ITEQ

1D
2.65%
1M
-3.28%
6M
5.33%
YTD
10.36%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
-1.44%
10Y*
9.84%
ALL TIME*
9.19%

FTEC

1D
1.71%
1M
0.31%
6M
22.49%
YTD
22.53%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
29.49%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
23.79%
ALL TIME*
21.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$86.23M$78.73M$94.95M
$214.03K$196.04K$284.63K

ITEQ vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
10.36%13.71%11.70%4.70%-30.36%-8.04%58.96%37.59%-0.63%26.87%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
22.53%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ITEQ and FTEC is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2015

0.77

The correlation between ITEQ and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITEQ vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITEQ
FTEC

Technology

64.1%
98.6%

Industrials

11.2%
0.3%

Utilities

9.1%

-

Financial Services

5.1%
0.5%

Healthcare

4.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
0.1%

Communication Services

2.9%
0.5%

Energy

1.4%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

ITEQ
64.1%
FTEC
98.6%

Industrials

ITEQ
11.2%
FTEC
0.3%

Utilities

ITEQ
9.1%
FTEC

-

Financial Services

ITEQ
5.1%
FTEC
0.5%

Healthcare

ITEQ
4.4%
FTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

ITEQ
3.3%
FTEC
0.1%

Communication Services

ITEQ
2.9%
FTEC
0.5%

Energy

ITEQ
1.4%
FTEC
0.3%

Basic Materials

ITEQ

-

FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

ITEQ

-

FTEC

-

Real Estate

ITEQ

-

FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITEQ vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ITEQ
ITEQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ITEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ITEQ vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITEQFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

2.32

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

6.23

-2.27

ITEQ vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITEQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITEQ and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITEQ vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITEQFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-34.95%

-19.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-16.26%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.90%

-27.30%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.29%

-34.95%

-15.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.63%

-34.95%

-19.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.23%

-8.48%

-9.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-5.59%

-12.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

6.04%

-0.72%

Volatility

ITEQ vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) have volatilities of 8.08% and 8.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITEQFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

8.41%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.94%

20.16%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.63%

24.30%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.36%

25.89%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.57%

24.99%

-1.42%

ITEQ vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITEQ vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than FTEC's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
0.77%0.85%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITEQ and FTEC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to ITEQ (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 23.79% vs 9.84% for ITEQ. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 23.79% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.

ITEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.

ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ITEQ and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITEQ and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer