ITEP.L vs. PMLP.L
ITEP.L (HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating) and PMLP.L (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITEP.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while PMLP.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITEP.L returned 7.67%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for PMLP.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITEP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PMLP.L.
Performance
ITEP.L vs. PMLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ITEP.L having a 24.59% return and PMLP.L slightly higher at 25.60%.
ITEP.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 15.22%
- YTD
- 24.59%
- 6M
- 19.79%
- 1Y
- 45.78%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
PMLP.L
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 25.60%
- 6M
- 23.75%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- —
ITEP.L vs. PMLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEP.L HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating | 24.59% | 10.45% | 14.23% | 43.21% | -39.07% | 9.11% | 27.29% |
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 25.60% | -1.40% | 35.81% | 7.61% | 35.33% | 34.88% | 8.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEP.L and PMLP.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020 | 0.19 |
The correlation between ITEP.L and PMLP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITEP.L vs. PMLP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITEP.L
PMLP.L
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ITEP.L
PMLP.L
-
Industrials
ITEP.L
PMLP.L
-
Communication Services
ITEP.L
PMLP.L
-
Financial Services
ITEP.L
PMLP.L
-
Healthcare
ITEP.L
PMLP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITEP.L
PMLP.L
-
Basic Materials
ITEP.L
PMLP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ITEP.L
-
PMLP.L
-
Energy
ITEP.L
-
PMLP.L
Real Estate
ITEP.L
-
PMLP.L
-
Utilities
ITEP.L
-
PMLP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITEP.L vs. PMLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
ITEP.L
PMLP.L
ITEP.L vs. PMLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating (ITEP.L) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITEP.L | PMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.58 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 7.47 | -2.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITEP.L | PMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.48 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 1.01 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.27 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
ITEP.L vs. PMLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEP.L drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, which is greater than PMLP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEP.L and PMLP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEP.L | PMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.84% | -20.50% | -27.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.64% | -10.82% | -10.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.42% | -20.50% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.84% | -20.50% | -27.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -5.14% | +3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.55% | -5.88% | -12.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.32% | 3.75% | +5.57% |
Volatility
ITEP.L vs. PMLP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating (ITEP.L) is 6.80%, while HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that ITEP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITEP.L | PMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 7.43% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 15.51% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.61% | 18.86% | +3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 19.86% | +5.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.68% | 21.34% | +5.34% |
ITEP.L vs. PMLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITEP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PMLP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITEP.L vs. PMLP.L - Dividend Comparison
ITEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PMLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEP.L HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 2.77% | 3.31% | 3.37% | 6.48% | 6.12% | 6.57% | 4.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITEP.L and PMLP.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMLP.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMLP.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ITEP.L.
ITEP.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while PMLP.L is Energy Equities. ITEP.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while PMLP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ITEP.L and 0.40% for PMLP.L.
Find the right allocation for ITEP.L and PMLP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer