PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDJ vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDJ vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDJ achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.


ITDJ

1D
-0.81%
1M
4.82%
YTD
12.11%
6M
13.07%
1Y
29.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-18.50%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDJ vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ITDJ
iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF
12.11%22.02%-1.70%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%-6.41%3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDJ and IBIT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2024

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDJ vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDJ
ITDJ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ITDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDJ vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITDJIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

-0.89

+3.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

-1.23

+4.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.86

+0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

-0.79

+3.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.33

-1.36

+14.70

ITDJ vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDJ and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITDJIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

-0.89

+3.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.30

+1.02

Drawdowns

ITDJ vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDJ drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDJ and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDJIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.63%

-49.36%

+32.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-49.36%

+39.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-48.10%

+47.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-16.02%

+14.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

28.44%

-26.26%

Volatility

ITDJ vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) is 3.90%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that ITDJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDJIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

9.50%

-5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

34.44%

-24.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

43.73%

-30.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

50.19%

-34.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.18%

50.19%

-34.01%

ITDJ vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDJ has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITDJ vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ITDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITDJ
iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF
1.25%1.40%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITDJ and IBIT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to ITDJ (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDJ dropped -16.63% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, ITDJ leads with 29.01% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, ITDJ is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ITDJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITDJ has performed better with a 29.01% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITDJ is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

ITDJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

ITDJ is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ITDJ and 0.25% for IBIT.

ITDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDJ and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer