ITDJ vs. FIGB
ITDJ (iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF) and FIGB (Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITDJ is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while FIGB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ITDJ returned 25.85% vs 3.95% for FIGB. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITDJ charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FIGB.
Performance
ITDJ vs. FIGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITDJ achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than FIGB's 0.16% return.
ITDJ
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIGB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
ITDJ vs. FIGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ITDJ iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF | 10.22% | 22.02% | -1.70% |
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF | 0.16% | 6.95% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITDJ and FIGB is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.22 |
The correlation between ITDJ and FIGB shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITDJ vs. FIGB — Risk / Return Rank
ITDJ
FIGB
ITDJ vs. FIGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITDJ | FIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.35 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.60 | 3.95 | +7.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITDJ vs. FIGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITDJ drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum FIGB drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDJ and FIGB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITDJ | FIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.63% | -18.08% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -2.93% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -1.58% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -6.87% | +4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 1.00% | +1.23% |
Volatility
ITDJ vs. FIGB - Volatility Comparison
iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) at 0.89%. This indicates that ITDJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITDJ | FIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 0.89% | +4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | 2.88% | +8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 4.04% | +9.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 6.28% | +10.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 6.15% | +10.24% |
ITDJ vs. FIGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITDJ has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FIGB's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITDJ vs. FIGB - Dividend Comparison
ITDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than FIGB's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.15% | 4.28% | 3.79% | 2.44% | 1.10% |
ITDJ iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF | 1.27% | 1.40% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITDJ and FIGB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITDJ has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to FIGB (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDJ dropped -16.63% vs FIGB's -18.08%.
On 1-year performance, ITDJ leads with 25.85% vs 3.95% for FIGB. On fees, ITDJ is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FIGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ITDJ has performed better with a 25.85% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITDJ is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FIGB.
FIGB has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 1.27% for ITDJ.
ITDJ is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while FIGB is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ITDJ and 0.36% for FIGB.
ITDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITDJ and FIGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer