PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDJ vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDJ vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDJ achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


ITDJ

1D
-0.81%
1M
4.82%
YTD
12.11%
6M
13.07%
1Y
29.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDJ vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ITDJ
iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF
12.11%22.02%-1.70%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
39.67%6.07%3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDJ and COMT is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2024

-0.05

The correlation between ITDJ and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ITDJ vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITDJ
COMT

Technology

26.8%

-

Financial Services

16.1%
100.0%

Industrials

11.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Communication Services

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Basic Materials

4.3%

-

Energy

4.3%

-

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.6%

-

Technology

ITDJ
26.8%
COMT

-

Financial Services

ITDJ
16.1%
COMT
100.0%

Industrials

ITDJ
11.9%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

ITDJ
9.3%
COMT

-

Healthcare

ITDJ
8.3%
COMT

-

Communication Services

ITDJ
8.1%
COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

ITDJ
4.8%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

ITDJ
4.3%
COMT

-

Energy

ITDJ
4.3%
COMT

-

Real Estate

ITDJ
3.5%
COMT

-

Utilities

ITDJ
2.6%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDJ vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDJ
ITDJ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ITDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDJ vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITDJCOMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

2.24

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

2.88

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

5.95

-2.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.33

14.11

-0.77

ITDJ vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDJ and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITDJCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.24

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.20

+1.11

Drawdowns

ITDJ vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDJ drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDJ and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDJCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.63%

-51.89%

+35.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-8.02%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-4.82%

+4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-24.07%

+22.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

3.38%

-1.20%

Volatility

ITDJ vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) is 3.90%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that ITDJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDJCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

7.37%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

18.80%

-8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

21.29%

-8.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

21.06%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.18%

18.89%

-2.71%

ITDJ vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDJ has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITDJ vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

ITDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
ITDJ
iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF
1.25%1.40%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITDJ and COMT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to ITDJ (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDJ dropped -16.63% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 29.01% for ITDJ. On fees, ITDJ is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ITDJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 29.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITDJ is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 1.25% for ITDJ.

ITDJ is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while COMT is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ITDJ and 0.48% for COMT.

ITDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDJ and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer