PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ITDJ vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ITDJ vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ITDJ (iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITDJ is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. ITDJ is actively managed, while ACWI is passively managed. Over the past year, ITDJ returned 29.01% vs 29.18% for ACWI. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ITDJ charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

ITDJ vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ITDJ having a 12.11% return and ACWI slightly higher at 12.13%.

ITDJ

1D
-0.81%
1M
4.82%
YTD
12.11%
6M
13.07%
1Y
29.01%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDJ vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
ITDJ
iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF		12.11%22.02%-1.70%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		12.13%22.41%-1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDJ and ACWI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2024

0.99

The correlation between ITDJ and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITDJ vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ITDJ
ACWI

Technology

26.8%
29.4%

Financial Services

16.1%
16.1%

Industrials

11.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.1%

Communication Services

8.1%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.0%

Basic Materials

4.3%
3.7%

Energy

4.3%
4.2%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.8%

Utilities

2.6%
2.6%

Technology

ITDJ
26.8%
ACWI
29.4%

Financial Services

ITDJ
16.1%
ACWI
16.1%

Industrials

ITDJ
11.9%
ACWI
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ITDJ
9.3%
ACWI
9.3%

Healthcare

ITDJ
8.3%
ACWI
8.1%

Communication Services

ITDJ
8.1%
ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

ITDJ
4.8%
ACWI
5.0%

Basic Materials

ITDJ
4.3%
ACWI
3.7%

Energy

ITDJ
4.3%
ACWI
4.2%

Real Estate

ITDJ
3.5%
ACWI
1.8%

Utilities

ITDJ
2.6%
ACWI
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF

Often compared with ITDJ:
ITDJ vs. ITDEITDJ vs. LDDRITDJ vs. ITDIITDJ vs. SGOVITDJ vs. ITDDITDJ vs. ITDBITDJ vs. ITDG
Often compared with ACWI:
ACWI vs. VTACWI vs. SPYACWI vs. VWRL.LACWI vs. ACWXACWI vs. ACWI.LACWI vs. VOOACWI vs. VTI

Return for Risk

ITDJ vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ITDJ
ITDJ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ITDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDJ vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ITDJACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.28
2.29

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.16
3.17

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.01

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

13.53

-0.19

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ITDJ vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDJ and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ITDJACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.29

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.71

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.75

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.43

+0.89

Drawdowns

ITDJ vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDJ drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDJ and ACWI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ITDJACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.63%

-56.00%

+39.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-9.73%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-16.55%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-26.42%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.53%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.83%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-8.61%

+6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.16%

+0.02%

Volatility

ITDJ vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ITDJACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.93%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

10.29%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

12.78%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

16.05%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.18%

17.11%

-0.93%

ITDJ vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDJ has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITDJ vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

ITDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than ACWI's 1.38% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
ITDJ
iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF		1.25%1.40%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.99, ITDJ and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to ITDJ (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDJ dropped -16.63% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 1-year performance, ACWI leads with 29.18% vs 29.01% for ITDJ. On fees, ITDJ is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 29.18% return vs 29.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITDJ is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.25% for ITDJ.

ITDJ is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while ACWI is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ITDJ and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDJ and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer