PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDI vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDI vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF (ITDI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDI achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.37% return.


ITDI

1D
1.22%
1M
2.02%
YTD
12.50%
6M
13.03%
1Y
29.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.42%
1Y
4.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDI vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ITDI and RBIL is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDI vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDI
ITDI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ITDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDI vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF (ITDI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITDIRBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

2.13

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

7.95

-4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

48.27

-35.19

ITDI vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDI Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDI and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITDI vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDI drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDI and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDIRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.31%

-0.52%

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-0.52%

-9.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.46%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-0.07%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

0.09%

+2.13%

Volatility

ITDI vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF (ITDI) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that ITDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDIRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

0.36%

+4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

0.85%

+10.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

0.95%

+12.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

1.07%

+13.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

1.07%

+13.57%

ITDI vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDI has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITDI vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ITDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ITDI
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF
1.45%1.63%1.68%0.84%
RBIL
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF
4.38%3.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITDI and RBIL have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITDI has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDI dropped -16.31% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

On 1-year performance, ITDI leads with 29.55% vs 4.01% for RBIL. On fees, ITDI is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITDI has performed better with a 29.55% return vs 4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITDI is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.45% for ITDI.

ITDI is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDI and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.36 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDI and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer