PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDG vs. IGIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDG vs. IGIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF (ITDG) and iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDG achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly higher than IGIB's -0.36% return.


ITDG

1D
1.05%
1M
0.97%
6M
8.59%
YTD
12.55%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.48%

IGIB

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.03%
6M
-0.49%
YTD
-0.36%
1Y
2.53%
3Y*
6.07%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
2.85%
ALL TIME*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$121.34M$134.90M$139.59M
$190.79K$238.56K$333.85K

ITDG vs. IGIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITDG
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF
12.55%21.85%16.56%12.68%
IGIB
iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
-0.36%9.58%3.49%10.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDG and IGIB is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.38

The correlation between ITDG and IGIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDG vs. IGIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ITDG
ITDG Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ITDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IGIB
IGIB Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IGIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGIB Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IGIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGIB Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ITDG vs. IGIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF (ITDG) and iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITDGIGIBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.11

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

0.84

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.06

2.39

+8.67

ITDG vs. IGIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the IGIB Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDG and IGIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITDG vs. IGIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDG drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum IGIB drawdown of -20.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDG and IGIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDGIGIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-20.62%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-3.01%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.89%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-2.57%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

1.06%

+1.21%

Volatility

ITDG vs. IGIB - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF (ITDG) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) at 1.11%. This indicates that ITDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDGIGIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

1.11%

+2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.37%

3.30%

+8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

4.04%

+9.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

6.58%

+7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.52%

6.07%

+8.45%

ITDG vs. IGIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDG has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than IGIB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITDG vs. IGIB - Dividend Comparison

ITDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than IGIB's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGIB
iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.92%4.59%4.41%3.78%3.04%2.52%2.74%3.44%3.41%2.51%2.45%2.51%
ITDG
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF
1.42%1.60%1.44%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITDG and IGIB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITDG has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to IGIB (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDG dropped -16.60% vs IGIB's -20.62%.

On 1-year performance, ITDG leads with 25.03% vs 2.53% for IGIB. On fees, IGIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IGIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITDG has performed better with a 25.03% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for ITDG.

IGIB has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 1.42% for ITDG.

ITDG is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while IGIB is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDG and 0.04% for IGIB.

ITDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDG and IGIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer