ITDG vs. IGIB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ITDG (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF) and IGIB (iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITDG is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while IGIB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Credit Index. ITDG is actively managed, while IGIB is passively managed. Over the past year, ITDG returned 28.74% vs 6.27% for IGIB. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITDG charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IGIB.

Performance

ITDG vs. IGIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF (ITDG) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDG achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly higher than IGIB's 0.21% return.

ITDG

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 4.78%
• YTD: 12.04%
• 6M: 12.96%
• 1Y: 28.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGIB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 0.21%
• 6M: 0.14%
• 1Y: 6.27%
• 3Y*: 6.21%
• 5Y*: 1.37%
• 10Y*: 3.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDG vs. IGIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ITDG Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF	12.04%	21.85%	16.56%	12.83%
IGIB iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF	0.21%	9.58%	3.49%	11.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDG and IGIB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023	0.37

Return for Risk

ITDG vs. IGIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDG

ITDG Risk / Return Rank: 68
ITDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ITDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ITDG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ITDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ITDG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

IGIB

IGIB Risk / Return Rank: 42
IGIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IGIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
IGIB Omega Ratio Rank: 41
IGIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IGIB Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDG vs. IGIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF (ITDG) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITDG	IGIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.52	+0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	2.26	+0.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.27	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	2.09	+0.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.34	7.08	+6.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ITDG vs. IGIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the IGIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDG and IGIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITDG	IGIB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	1.52	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.75	0.70	+1.05

Drawdowns

ITDG vs. IGIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDG drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum IGIB drawdown of -20.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDG and IGIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITDG	IGIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.60%	-20.62%	+4.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.54%	-3.01%	-6.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.62%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-1.33%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-2.58%	+1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	0.89%	+1.27%

Volatility

ITDG vs. IGIB - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF (ITDG) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) at 1.33%. This indicates that ITDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITDG	IGIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	1.33%	+2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.06%	3.08%	+6.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.54%	4.14%	+8.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.44%	6.56%	+7.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.44%	6.06%	+8.38%

ITDG vs. IGIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDG has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than IGIB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ITDG vs. IGIB - Dividend Comparison

ITDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than IGIB's 4.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGIB iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF	4.82%	4.59%	4.41%	3.78%	3.04%	2.52%	2.74%	3.44%	3.41%	2.51%	2.45%	2.51%
ITDG Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF	1.43%	1.60%	1.44%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITDG and IGIB in my portfolio?

ITDG and IGIB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ITDG or IGIB?

ITDG has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to IGIB (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDG dropped -16.60% vs IGIB's -20.62%.

Which ETF is better, ITDG or IGIB?

On 1-year performance, ITDG leads with 28.74% vs 6.27% for IGIB. On fees, IGIB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IGIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITDG or IGIB?

Over the 1-year period, ITDG has performed better with a 28.74% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITDG or IGIB?

IGIB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for ITDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITDG or IGIB?

IGIB has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 1.43% for ITDG.

What is the main difference between ITDG and IGIB?

ITDG is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while IGIB is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDG and 0.06% for IGIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ITDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.