PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDC vs. FFNOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDC vs. FFNOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) and Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDC achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly lower than FFNOX's 11.58% return.


ITDC

1D
-0.50%
1M
3.02%
YTD
7.85%
6M
8.24%
1Y
19.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFNOX

1D
0.41%
1M
5.12%
YTD
11.58%
6M
12.27%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDC vs. FFNOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITDC
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF
7.85%16.10%11.41%12.40%
FFNOX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund
11.58%20.18%13.05%12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDC and FFNOX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

0.97

The correlation between ITDC and FFNOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDC vs. FFNOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDC
ITDC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FFNOX
FFNOX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FFNOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFNOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFNOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FFNOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFNOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDC vs. FFNOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) and Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITDCFFNOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

2.41

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.24

3.35

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.12

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.15

13.59

-0.45

ITDC vs. FFNOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDC Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FFNOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDC and FFNOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITDCFFNOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.41

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.88

0.44

+1.44

Drawdowns

ITDC vs. FFNOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDC drawdown since its inception was -10.39%, smaller than the maximum FFNOX drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDC and FFNOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDCFFNOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-49.84%

+39.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-8.60%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-8.70%

+7.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.97%

-0.48%

Volatility

ITDC vs. FFNOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) is 2.82%, while Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that ITDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFNOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDCFFNOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.47%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

8.97%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.58%

11.15%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.05%

13.76%

-3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.05%

14.57%

-4.52%

ITDC vs. FFNOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FFNOX's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITDC vs. FFNOX - Dividend Comparison

ITDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than FFNOX's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFNOX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund
2.30%3.68%6.43%3.18%7.14%5.71%2.87%2.96%2.90%0.64%2.50%0.70%
ITDC
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF
1.88%2.02%1.93%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, ITDC and FFNOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFNOX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to ITDC (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDC dropped -10.39% vs FFNOX's -49.84%.

FFNOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDC and FFNOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer