PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFNOX vs. FBALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFNOX vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFNOX achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than FBALX's 9.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFNOX having a 11.60% annualized return and FBALX not far ahead at 11.98%.


FFNOX

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.88%
YTD
11.15%
6M
10.54%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
11.60%

FBALX

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.03%
YTD
9.80%
6M
9.32%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFNOX vs. FBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFNOX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund
11.15%20.18%13.05%19.29%-18.02%17.05%16.30%25.09%-6.58%17.09%
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
9.80%15.11%16.09%20.31%-18.29%18.27%22.45%24.40%-3.98%16.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FFNOX and FBALX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 1999

0.96

The correlation between FFNOX and FBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFNOX vs. FBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFNOX
FFNOX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FFNOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFNOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFNOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FFNOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFNOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FBALX
FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFNOX vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFNOXFBALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.49

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.65

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.91

17.07

-4.16

FFNOX vs. FBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFNOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the FBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFNOX and FBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFNOX vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFNOX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than FBALX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFNOX and FBALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFNOXFBALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-43.57%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-6.47%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.10%

-12.88%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-22.89%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.93%

-26.68%

-3.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.51%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-4.37%

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.38%

+0.63%

Volatility

FFNOX vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) at 3.67%. This indicates that FFNOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFNOXFBALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

3.67%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

7.48%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

9.18%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

12.26%

+1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

12.82%

+1.80%

FFNOX vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFNOX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FBALX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFNOX vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison

FFNOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than FBALX's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
5.16%5.69%5.67%2.28%8.06%9.66%5.90%4.24%10.99%7.90%3.07%7.70%
FFNOX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund
2.31%3.68%6.43%3.18%7.14%5.71%2.87%2.96%2.90%0.64%2.50%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FFNOX and FBALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFNOX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to FBALX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFNOX dropped -49.84% vs FBALX's -43.57%.

FBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFNOX and FBALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer