ITDC vs. DGRO
ITDC (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITDC is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. ITDC is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past year, ITDC returned 14.96% vs 21.33% for DGRO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITDC charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
ITDC vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITDC achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 12.13% return.
ITDC
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
ITDC vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDC Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF | 7.11% | 16.10% | 11.41% | 12.40% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 12.13% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 9.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITDC and DGRO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ITDC and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITDC vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
ITDC
DGRO
ITDC vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITDC | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 3.31 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.80 | 12.79 | -2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITDC vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITDC drawdown since its inception was -10.39%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDC and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITDC | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -35.10% | +24.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -6.47% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.59% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -3.42% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.67% | -0.14% |
Volatility
ITDC vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) is 2.37%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that ITDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITDC | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 2.90% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.62% | 7.11% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.05% | 9.54% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 13.80% | -3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 16.57% | -6.49% |
ITDC vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITDC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITDC vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
ITDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than DGRO's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.92% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
ITDC Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF | 1.89% | 2.02% | 1.93% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITDC and DGRO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRO has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to ITDC (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDC dropped -10.39% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 1-year performance, DGRO leads with 21.33% vs 14.96% for ITDC. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ITDC has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 21.33% return vs 14.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for ITDC.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.89% for ITDC.
ITDC is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ITDC and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITDC and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer