PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDB vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDB vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDB achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.64% return.


ITDB

1D
0.16%
1M
1.96%
YTD
6.50%
6M
6.87%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
0.81%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.87%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDB vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITDB
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF
6.50%14.58%9.65%11.73%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.64%15.69%16.62%10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDB and DGRO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

0.74

The correlation between ITDB and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITDB vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITDB
DGRO

Technology

26.0%
19.4%

Financial Services

14.9%
21.2%

Industrials

12.3%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
5.7%

Communication Services

8.0%
0.1%

Healthcare

7.6%
16.4%

Real Estate

5.4%

-

Energy

4.6%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
11.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
2.5%

Utilities

3.8%
6.9%

Technology

ITDB
26.0%
DGRO
19.4%

Financial Services

ITDB
14.9%
DGRO
21.2%

Industrials

ITDB
12.3%
DGRO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ITDB
8.9%
DGRO
5.7%

Communication Services

ITDB
8.0%
DGRO
0.1%

Healthcare

ITDB
7.6%
DGRO
16.4%

Real Estate

ITDB
5.4%
DGRO

-

Energy

ITDB
4.6%
DGRO
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

ITDB
4.6%
DGRO
11.5%

Basic Materials

ITDB
3.9%
DGRO
2.5%

Utilities

ITDB
3.8%
DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDB vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDB
ITDB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ITDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDB Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDB vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITDBDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.71

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.83

14.33

-1.50

ITDB vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDB Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDB and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITDBDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.53

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.94

0.77

+1.17

Drawdowns

ITDB vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDB drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDB and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDBDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-35.10%

+26.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-6.47%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.94%

-3.44%

+2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

1.67%

-0.39%

Volatility

ITDB vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.24%. This indicates that ITDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDBDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.24%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

6.94%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23%

9.49%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.60%

13.82%

-5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.60%

16.62%

-8.02%

ITDB vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITDB vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

ITDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than DGRO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
ITDB
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF
1.92%2.05%1.96%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITDB and DGRO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITDB has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to DGRO (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDB dropped -8.41% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 1-year performance, DGRO leads with 23.89% vs 16.43% for ITDB. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 23.89% return vs 16.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ITDB.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.92% for ITDB.

ITDB is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ITDB and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDB and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer