ITB vs. XLI
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITB returned 13.43%/yr vs 14.04%/yr for XLI. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
ITB vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly lower than XLI's 16.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ITB having a 13.43% annualized return and XLI not far ahead at 14.04%.
ITB
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- -5.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.08%
XLI
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 21.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $179.18M | $195.32M | $218.82M | |
| $1.17B | $1.19B | $1.34B |
ITB vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -1.69% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 16.55% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and XLI is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ITB and XLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
ITB vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
XLI
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
XLI
Industrials
ITB
XLI
Basic Materials
ITB
XLI
Real Estate
ITB
XLI
-
Communication Services
ITB
-
XLI
-
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
XLI
-
Energy
ITB
-
XLI
-
Financial Services
ITB
-
XLI
-
Healthcare
ITB
-
XLI
-
Technology
ITB
-
XLI
Utilities
ITB
-
XLI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
XLI
ITB vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.21 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 1.63 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 6.43 | -6.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than XLI's maximum drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -62.26% | -24.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -12.21% | -13.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -18.49% | -14.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -21.64% | -18.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | -42.33% | -9.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.47% | -3.08% | -22.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.98% | -9.16% | -27.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.54% | 3.09% | +11.45% |
Volatility
ITB vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) at 4.83%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 4.83% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.03% | 14.00% | +8.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.51% | 16.92% | +12.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 17.60% | +11.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 20.04% | +10.16% |
ITB vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than XLI's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.68% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and XLI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to XLI (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs XLI's -62.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.04% vs 13.43% for ITB. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITB.
XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.68% for ITB.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while XLI is Industrials Equities. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.08% for XLI.
XLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer