ITB vs. WFH
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH).
ITB and WFH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. It was launched on May 1, 2006. WFH is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Solactive Remote Work Index. It was launched on Jun 25, 2020. Both ITB and WFH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ITB vs. WFH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ITB vs. WFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -5.30% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 30.92% |
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF | 0.00% | 15.47% | 18.55% | 35.75% | -45.26% | 10.77% | 34.26% |
Returns By Period
ITB
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -13.12%
- YTD
- -5.30%
- 6M
- -15.52%
- 1Y
- -3.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
WFH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITB vs. WFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than WFH's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. WFH — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
WFH
ITB vs. WFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITB | WFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.07 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITB | WFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and WFH is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ITB vs. WFH - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than WFH's 0.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.25% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF | 0.91% | 0.94% | 0.50% | 0.67% | 0.42% | 0.79% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ITB vs. WFH - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | WFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.21% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.20% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.53% | — | — |
Volatility
ITB vs. WFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | WFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.43% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.07% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.81% | — | — |