PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITB vs. WFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITB vs. WFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ITB

1D
-0.85%
1M
1.29%
YTD
-3.80%
6M
-12.12%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
13.64%

WFH

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITB vs. WFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
-3.80%-5.26%2.06%68.91%-26.26%49.25%30.92%
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.00%15.47%18.55%35.75%-45.26%10.77%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ITB and WFH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between ITB and WFH has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ITB vs. WFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITB
WFH

Consumer Cyclical

71.8%
2.3%

Industrials

19.1%
2.2%

Basic Materials

8.6%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Communication Services

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

86.2%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ITB
71.8%
WFH
2.3%

Industrials

ITB
19.1%
WFH
2.2%

Basic Materials

ITB
8.6%
WFH

-

Real Estate

ITB
0.5%
WFH

-

Communication Services

ITB

-

WFH
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

ITB

-

WFH

-

Energy

ITB

-

WFH

-

Financial Services

ITB

-

WFH

-

Healthcare

ITB

-

WFH

-

Technology

ITB

-

WFH
86.2%

Utilities

ITB

-

WFH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITB vs. WFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITB
ITB Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

WFH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITB vs. WFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITBWFHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

ITB vs. WFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITBWFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

Drawdowns

ITB vs. WFH - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITBWFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.09%

Volatility

ITB vs. WFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITBWFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.00%

ITB vs. WFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than WFH's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITB vs. WFH - Dividend Comparison

ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than WFH's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
1.23%1.67%0.46%0.48%0.86%0.37%0.46%0.50%0.63%0.28%0.43%0.34%
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.91%0.94%0.50%0.67%0.42%0.79%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITB and WFH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ITB is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WFH.

ITB has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.91% for WFH.

ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while WFH is Technology Equities. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while WFH tracks Solactive Remote Work Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ITB and 0.45% for WFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITB and WFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer