ITB vs. SOXX
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITB returned 13.44%/yr vs 34.00%/yr for SOXX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
ITB vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 84.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 13.44%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 34.00% annualized return.
ITB
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -10.42%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- -1.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
SOXX
- 1D
- -4.77%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- 6M
- 67.77%
- YTD
- 84.03%
- 1Y
- 125.94%
- 3Y*
- 48.43%
- 5Y*
- 31.11%
- 10Y*
- 34.00%
ITB vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.36% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 84.03% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and SOXX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ITB and SOXX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ITB vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
SOXX
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
SOXX
-
Industrials
ITB
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
ITB
SOXX
-
Real Estate
ITB
SOXX
-
Communication Services
ITB
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
SOXX
-
Energy
ITB
-
SOXX
-
Financial Services
ITB
-
SOXX
-
Healthcare
ITB
-
SOXX
-
Technology
ITB
-
SOXX
Utilities
ITB
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
SOXX
ITB vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.44 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 8.03 | -8.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 25.14 | -25.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than SOXX's maximum drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -70.21% | -16.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -15.77% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -41.36% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -45.75% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | -45.75% | -6.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.92% | -15.48% | -8.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.02% | -19.92% | -17.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.00% | 5.03% | +8.97% |
Volatility
ITB vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) is 10.84%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.50%. This indicates that ITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 22.50% | -11.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.25% | 36.44% | -14.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.26% | 42.11% | -11.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.51% | 37.77% | -8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.14% | 34.27% | -4.13% |
ITB vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.67% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and SOXX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (22.50%) compared to ITB (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 34.00% vs 13.44% for ITB. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ITB has been the lower-risk option at 10.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 34.00% return vs 13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITB.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while SOXX is Semiconductors. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer