ITB vs. RSPR
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and RSPR (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while RSPR is a REIT fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITB returned 13.43%/yr vs 5.63%/yr for RSPR. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPR.
Performance
ITB vs. RSPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly lower than RSPR's 12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has outperformed RSPR with an annualized return of 13.43%, while RSPR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.63% annualized return.
ITB
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- -5.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.08%
RSPR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 10.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- 5.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $179.18M | $195.32M | $218.82M | |
| $510.77K | $450.22K | $625.86K |
ITB vs. RSPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -1.69% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 12.19% | -1.88% | 8.61% | 11.59% | -25.16% | 49.61% | -2.90% | 24.62% | -4.11% | 8.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and RSPR is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2015 | 0.50 |
The correlation between ITB and RSPR shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. RSPR — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
RSPR
ITB vs. RSPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | RSPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.13 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 1.16 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 2.94 | -3.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. RSPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than RSPR's maximum drawdown of -41.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and RSPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | RSPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -41.96% | -44.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -8.71% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -17.78% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -33.03% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | -41.96% | -10.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.47% | -2.06% | -23.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.98% | -9.28% | -27.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.54% | 3.43% | +11.11% |
Volatility
ITB vs. RSPR - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) at 4.39%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | RSPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 4.39% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.03% | 11.05% | +10.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.51% | 14.61% | +14.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 19.15% | +10.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 21.40% | +8.80% |
ITB vs. RSPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. RSPR - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than RSPR's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.68% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 2.80% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 2.91% | 3.14% | 2.56% | 3.82% | 2.48% | 3.02% | 3.01% | 2.06% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and RSPR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to RSPR (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs RSPR's -41.96%.
On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 13.43% vs 5.63% for RSPR. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, RSPR has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 5.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.
RSPR has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.68% for ITB.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while RSPR is REIT. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.40% for RSPR.
RSPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and RSPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer