ITB vs. PEXL
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while PEXL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITB returned 8.18%/yr vs 12.54%/yr for PEXL. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.
Performance
ITB vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 20.11% return.
ITB
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- -5.10%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 7.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
PEXL
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 20.78%
- 1Y
- 48.63%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- —
ITB vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.87% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -22.57% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 20.11% | 27.33% | 5.79% | 24.40% | -20.41% | 30.12% | 25.02% | 39.86% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and PEXL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between ITB and PEXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITB vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
PEXL
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
PEXL
Industrials
ITB
PEXL
Basic Materials
ITB
PEXL
Real Estate
ITB
PEXL
-
Communication Services
ITB
-
PEXL
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
PEXL
Energy
ITB
-
PEXL
Financial Services
ITB
-
PEXL
-
Healthcare
ITB
-
PEXL
Technology
ITB
-
PEXL
Utilities
ITB
-
PEXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
PEXL
ITB vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.42 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 4.07 | -3.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 16.91 | -16.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than PEXL's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -36.76% | -49.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -11.43% | -14.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -24.72% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -30.44% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.53% | -2.44% | -21.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -6.71% | -30.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.45% | 2.75% | +10.70% |
Volatility
ITB vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) at 7.58%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 7.58% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.89% | 14.39% | +6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.90% | 18.75% | +11.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.29% | 22.01% | +7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.05% | 24.10% | +5.95% |
ITB vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than PEXL's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.17% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.30% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and PEXL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to PEXL (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs PEXL's -36.76%.
On 5-year performance, PEXL leads with 12.54% vs 8.18% for ITB. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PEXL has been the lower-risk option at 7.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 12.54% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEXL.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.30% for PEXL.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while PEXL is Mid Cap Blend Equities. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.60% for PEXL.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer