ITB vs. EBIZ
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and EBIZ (Global X E-commerce ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while EBIZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Solactive E-commerce Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITB returned 6.57%/yr vs -0.64%/yr for EBIZ. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EBIZ.
Performance
ITB vs. EBIZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly higher than EBIZ's -6.79% return.
ITB
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- -5.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.08%
EBIZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- 6M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- -3.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- -0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $116.62K | $95.82K | $90.71K | |
| $179.18M | $195.32M | $218.82M |
ITB vs. EBIZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -1.69% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -7.28% |
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | -6.79% | 17.74% | 31.26% | 30.88% | -40.96% | -13.26% | 74.39% | 32.76% | -10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and EBIZ is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between ITB and EBIZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITB vs. EBIZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
EBIZ
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
EBIZ
Industrials
ITB
EBIZ
Basic Materials
ITB
EBIZ
-
Real Estate
ITB
EBIZ
Communication Services
ITB
-
EBIZ
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
EBIZ
-
Energy
ITB
-
EBIZ
-
Financial Services
ITB
-
EBIZ
Healthcare
ITB
-
EBIZ
Technology
ITB
-
EBIZ
Utilities
ITB
-
EBIZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. EBIZ — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
EBIZ
ITB vs. EBIZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | EBIZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.97 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | -0.19 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | -0.34 | +0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. EBIZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than EBIZ's maximum drawdown of -61.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and EBIZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | EBIZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -61.58% | -24.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -27.73% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -27.73% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -56.03% | +15.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.47% | -18.32% | -7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.98% | -24.30% | -12.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.54% | 15.76% | -1.22% |
Volatility
ITB vs. EBIZ - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) at 5.67%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBIZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | EBIZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 5.67% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.03% | 16.20% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.51% | 20.83% | +8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 28.95% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 28.53% | +1.67% |
ITB vs. EBIZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than EBIZ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. EBIZ - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than EBIZ's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.57% | 0.84% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.68% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and EBIZ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to EBIZ (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs EBIZ's -61.58%.
On 5-year performance, ITB leads with 6.57% vs -0.64% for EBIZ. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, EBIZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ITB has performed better with a 6.57% return vs -0.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EBIZ.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.50% for EBIZ.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while EBIZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.50% for EBIZ.
ITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and EBIZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer