PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITB vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITB vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has outperformed DBO with an annualized return of 13.64%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.


ITB

1D
-0.85%
1M
1.29%
YTD
-3.80%
6M
-12.12%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
13.64%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITB vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
-3.80%-5.26%2.06%68.91%-26.26%49.25%26.42%48.70%-30.92%59.65%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ITB and DBO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

0.16

The correlation between ITB and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ITB vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITB
DBO

Consumer Cyclical

71.8%

-

Industrials

19.1%

-

Basic Materials

8.6%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

116.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ITB
71.8%
DBO

-

Industrials

ITB
19.1%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

ITB
8.6%
DBO

-

Real Estate

ITB
0.5%
DBO

-

Communication Services

ITB

-

DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

ITB

-

DBO

-

Energy

ITB

-

DBO

-

Financial Services

ITB

-

DBO
116.0%

Healthcare

ITB

-

DBO

-

Technology

ITB

-

DBO

-

Utilities

ITB

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITB vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITB
ITB Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITB vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITBDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.38

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

4.44

-4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

9.02

-8.71

ITB vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITB Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITB and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITBDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

2.34

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.50

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.36

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.02

+0.09

Drawdowns

ITB vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, roughly equal to the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITBDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.53%

-90.18%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

-18.19%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-28.20%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.55%

-37.68%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.10%

-61.69%

+9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.07%

-51.38%

+24.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-62.25%

+25.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.09%

8.92%

+4.17%

Volatility

ITB vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) is 8.17%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that ITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITBDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

12.61%

-4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.42%

28.20%

-7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.47%

34.46%

-4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.19%

32.29%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.00%

31.78%

-1.78%

ITB vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITB vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
1.23%1.67%0.46%0.48%0.86%0.37%0.46%0.50%0.63%0.28%0.43%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITB and DBO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to ITB (8.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 13.64% vs 11.37% for DBO. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, ITB has been the lower-risk option at 8.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITB is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.23% for ITB.

ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while DBO is Oil & Gas. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ITB and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITB and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer