PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITA vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITA vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITA achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -2.40% return.


ITA

1D
-0.95%
1M
4.16%
YTD
8.97%
6M
11.71%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
27.30%
5Y*
16.86%
10Y*
15.34%

GLDM

1D
0.11%
1M
-9.52%
YTD
-2.40%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITA vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.97%48.64%15.81%14.33%9.96%9.39%-13.57%30.51%-9.23%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-2.40%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ITA and GLDM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.08

The correlation between ITA and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITA vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITA
ITA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITA vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITAGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.00

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

2.87

+2.33

ITA vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITA Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITA and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITA vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITA drawdown since its inception was -59.72%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITA and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITAGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.72%

-24.35%

-35.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.82%

-24.35%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.82%

-24.35%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.72%

-24.35%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.64%

-21.96%

+15.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-6.27%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

8.44%

-2.47%

Volatility

ITA vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 7.73%. This indicates that ITA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITAGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

7.73%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.47%

23.93%

-5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.74%

27.15%

-5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.21%

18.13%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.22%

16.98%

+6.24%

ITA vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITA has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITA vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

ITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.46%0.55%0.85%0.93%0.95%0.82%1.07%1.54%1.13%0.91%1.07%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITA and GLDM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to GLDM (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITA dropped -59.72% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.41% vs 16.86% for ITA. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 7.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 16.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITA.

ITA has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

ITA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while GLDM is Gold. ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITA and 0.10% for GLDM.

ITA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITA and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer