PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISX5.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISX5.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISX5.L is traded in USD, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISX5.L achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.61% return.


ISX5.L

1D
0.93%
1M
0.69%
YTD
6.38%
6M
8.51%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*

CMU.L

1D
0.37%
1M
7.21%
YTD
15.61%
6M
17.98%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISX5.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISX5.L
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.38%37.35%4.89%27.49%-14.22%13.65%7.93%24.55%-15.55%27.04%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
15.62%35.19%-0.27%20.43%-15.42%12.00%7.79%24.28%-16.87%28.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ISX5.L and CMU.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2016

0.79

The correlation between ISX5.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISX5.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISX5.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

25.0%
21.8%

Industrials

21.4%
15.7%

Technology

17.0%
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
5.2%

Energy

5.3%
0.0%

Healthcare

5.3%
4.2%

Utilities

4.7%
5.8%

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.3%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Financial Services

ISX5.L
25.0%
CMU.L
21.8%

Industrials

ISX5.L
21.4%
CMU.L
15.7%

Technology

ISX5.L
17.0%
CMU.L
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ISX5.L
9.8%
CMU.L
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

ISX5.L
5.6%
CMU.L
5.2%

Energy

ISX5.L
5.3%
CMU.L
0.0%

Healthcare

ISX5.L
5.3%
CMU.L
4.2%

Utilities

ISX5.L
4.7%
CMU.L
5.8%

Basic Materials

ISX5.L
3.5%
CMU.L
2.8%

Communication Services

ISX5.L
2.5%
CMU.L
2.3%

Real Estate

ISX5.L

-

CMU.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISX5.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISX5.L
ISX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ISX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISX5.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISX5.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.21

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

8.18

-3.56

ISX5.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISX5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISX5.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISX5.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.68

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.48

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.36

+0.30

Drawdowns

ISX5.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISX5.L drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -40.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISX5.L and CMU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISX5.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.94%

-40.93%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-12.77%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-13.90%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.86%

-35.44%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.49%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-9.51%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

3.45%

+0.39%

Volatility

ISX5.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) have volatilities of 6.08% and 5.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISX5.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

5.95%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

13.76%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

16.77%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

19.34%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

19.39%

+3.55%

ISX5.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISX5.L has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISX5.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISX5.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ISX5.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ISX5.L is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISX5.L is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for ISX5.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISX5.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer