ISWN vs. DMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR).
ISWN and DMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISWN is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the S-Network International BlackSwan. It was launched on Jan 25, 2021. DMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 18, 2021.
Performance
ISWN vs. DMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ISWN vs. DMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | 0.94% | 23.23% | -3.96% | 8.19% | -24.93% | 3.41% |
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March | 1.79% | 9.13% | 12.74% | 12.25% | -5.48% | 7.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISWN achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than DMAR's 1.79% return.
ISWN
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -6.89%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 15.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAR
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 12.53%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISWN vs. DMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ISWN vs. DMAR — Risk / Return Rank
ISWN
DMAR
ISWN vs. DMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISWN | DMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.66 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 2.45 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.51 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.08 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 13.69 | -7.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISWN | DMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.66 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 1.00 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 1.03 | -1.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ISWN and DMAR is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ISWN vs. DMAR - Dividend Comparison
ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, while DMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | 2.91% | 2.89% | 3.27% | 2.91% | 2.00% | 0.76% |
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ISWN vs. DMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, which is greater than DMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and DMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISWN | DMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.35% | -9.84% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -6.15% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.35% | -9.84% | -22.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | -0.14% | -6.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.57% | -1.91% | -14.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 0.93% | +1.39% |
Volatility
ISWN vs. DMAR - Volatility Comparison
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) at 1.94%. This indicates that ISWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ISWN | DMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 1.94% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.60% | 2.71% | +5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 7.59% | +4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.47% | 7.06% | +4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.40% | 7.05% | +4.35% |