PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISWN vs. DMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ISWN vs. DMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ISWN vs. DMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
0.94%23.23%-3.96%8.19%-24.93%3.41%
DMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March
1.79%9.13%12.74%12.25%-5.48%7.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWN achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than DMAR's 1.79% return.


ISWN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
0.94%
6M
3.42%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*

DMAR

1D
1.41%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.79%
6M
4.00%
1Y
12.53%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ISWN vs. DMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ISWN vs. DMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAR
DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWN vs. DMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISWNDMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

1.66

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

2.45

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.51

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.08

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.68

13.69

-7.00

ISWN vs. DMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the DMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWN and DMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISWNDMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.66

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

1.00

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

1.03

-1.08

Correlation

The correlation between ISWN and DMAR is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ISWN vs. DMAR - Dividend Comparison

ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, while DMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.91%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%
DMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ISWN vs. DMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, which is greater than DMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and DMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ISWNDMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.35%

-9.84%

-22.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-6.15%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

-9.84%

-22.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-0.14%

-6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-1.91%

-14.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

0.93%

+1.39%

Volatility

ISWN vs. DMAR - Volatility Comparison

Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) at 1.94%. This indicates that ISWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ISWNDMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

1.94%

+4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

2.71%

+5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

7.59%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.47%

7.06%

+4.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

7.05%

+4.35%