PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ISWD.L vs. SMH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ISWD.L (iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and SMH.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Islamic Index, while SMH.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISWD.L returned 12.30%/yr vs 38.14%/yr for SMH.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISWD.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.L.

Performance

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISWD.L is traded in GBp, while SMH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWD.L achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than SMH.L's 91.91% return.

ISWD.L

1D
0.02%
1M
2.12%
YTD
17.58%
6M
17.39%
1Y
33.31%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
11.52%

SMH.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
12.84%
YTD
91.91%
6M
92.85%
1Y
162.95%
3Y*
59.93%
5Y*
38.14%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		17.58%11.15%7.45%16.76%-1.26%22.98%2.26%
SMH.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF		91.91%38.57%26.28%67.15%-27.87%44.10%2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ISWD.L and SMH.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020

0.70

The correlation between ISWD.L and SMH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ISWD.L
SMH.L

Technology

44.3%
100.0%

Industrials

13.2%

-

Healthcare

11.4%

-

Energy

10.1%

-

Basic Materials

9.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.5%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Communication Services

0.6%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Technology

ISWD.L
44.3%
SMH.L
100.0%

Industrials

ISWD.L
13.2%
SMH.L

-

Healthcare

ISWD.L
11.4%
SMH.L

-

Energy

ISWD.L
10.1%
SMH.L

-

Basic Materials

ISWD.L
9.3%
SMH.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISWD.L
6.4%
SMH.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ISWD.L
3.5%
SMH.L

-

Utilities

ISWD.L
0.7%
SMH.L

-

Communication Services

ISWD.L
0.6%
SMH.L

-

Real Estate

ISWD.L
0.2%
SMH.L

-

Financial Services

ISWD.L
0.0%
SMH.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF

Often compared with ISWD.L:
ISWD.L vs. IGDA.LISWD.L vs. SPUSISWD.L vs. HLALISWD.L vs. VOOISWD.L vs. SPWOISWD.L vs. HIWS.LISWD.L vs. UMMA
Often compared with SMH.L:
SMH.L vs. AINF.LSMH.L vs. VWRL.LSMH.L vs. VHVG.LSMH.L vs. SMGB.LSMH.L vs. SMT.LSMH.L vs. VWRA.LSMH.L vs. WQDV.L

Return for Risk

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ISWD.L
ISWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
SMH.L
SMH.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ISWD.LSMH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.75
4.81

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.64
4.94

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.64

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.02

13.24

-7.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.96

44.01

-25.05

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is lower than the SMH.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWD.L and SMH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWD.L drawdown since its inception was -64.35%, which is greater than SMH.L's maximum drawdown of -36.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWD.L and SMH.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ISWD.LSMH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.35%

-36.36%

-27.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-12.23%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

-36.36%

+15.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.00%

-36.36%

+15.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.90%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-5.72%

+3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.00%

-9.77%

-8.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

3.69%

-1.94%

Volatility

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) is 4.92%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) has a volatility of 13.92%. This indicates that ISWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ISWD.LSMH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

13.92%

-9.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

27.05%

-17.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

33.76%

-21.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.41%

31.74%

-18.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.32%

31.33%

-17.01%

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWD.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISWD.L vs. SMH.L - Dividend Comparison

ISWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while SMH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		0.97%1.13%1.37%1.60%2.03%1.45%1.49%1.85%1.82%1.60%1.57%1.72%
SMH.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ISWD.L and SMH.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMH.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISWD.L.

ISWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH.L is Semiconductors. ISWD.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Index, while SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISWD.L and 0.35% for SMH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISWD.L and SMH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer