PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH.L vs. AINF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH.L vs. AINF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMH.L is traded in USD, while AINF.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AINF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH.L achieves a 98.88% return, which is significantly higher than AINF.L's 59.11% return.


SMH.L

1D
0.54%
1M
22.10%
YTD
98.88%
6M
103.25%
1Y
181.35%
3Y*
62.90%
5Y*
39.19%
10Y*

AINF.L

1D
0.00%
1M
14.47%
YTD
59.11%
6M
63.76%
1Y
112.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH.L vs. AINF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMH.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
98.88%49.20%0.41%
AINF.L
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
59.11%44.91%-1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH.L and AINF.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024

0.90

The correlation between SMH.L and AINF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH.L vs. AINF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH.L
SMH.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH.L vs. AINF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMH.LAINF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.60

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.12

3.67

+9.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.30

7.09

+39.20

SMH.L vs. AINF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.39, which is higher than the AINF.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH.L and AINF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMH.L vs. AINF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH.L drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than AINF.L's maximum drawdown of -30.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH.L and AINF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMH.LAINF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.38%

-30.61%

-14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-30.61%

+16.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-10.21%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

15.85%

-11.90%

Volatility

SMH.L vs. AINF.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) has a higher volatility of 13.18% compared to iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) at 10.85%. This indicates that SMH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AINF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMH.LAINF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.18%

10.85%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.46%

20.56%

+6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.96%

49.89%

-15.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.88%

44.53%

-11.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.48%

44.53%

-12.05%

SMH.L vs. AINF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMH.L and AINF.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

SMH.L vs. AINF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMH.L nor AINF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH.L and AINF.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH.L and AINF.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

SMH.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while AINF.L is Technology Equities. SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index, while AINF.L tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Net Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH.L and AINF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer