ISVL vs. SMIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISVL (iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF) and SMIG (Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. ISVL is passively managed, while SMIG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISVL returned 21.34%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for SMIG. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISVL charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SMIG.

Performance

ISVL vs. SMIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISVL achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than SMIG's 10.18% return.

ISVL

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 12.58%
• 1Y: 28.37%
• 3Y*: 21.34%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: —

SMIG

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 6M: 11.46%
• 1Y: 11.81%
• 3Y*: 13.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISVL vs. SMIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF	8.45%	42.84%	4.58%	17.56%	-13.69%	0.40%
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF	10.18%	0.78%	17.63%	13.62%	-11.83%	5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ISVL and SMIG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021	0.68

The correlation between ISVL and SMIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISVL vs. SMIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISVL	SMIG
Industrials	23.3%	13.9%
Financial Services	20.8%	14.2%
Real Estate	11.1%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	17.2%
Basic Materials	9.1%	7.9%
Energy	7.3%	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	2.4%
Technology	4.7%	19.8%
Healthcare	3.7%	10.1%
Communication Services	3.0%	2.2%
Utilities	1.5%	5.4%

Return for Risk

ISVL vs. SMIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISVL

ISVL Risk / Return Rank: 54
ISVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
ISVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ISVL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ISVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
ISVL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

SMIG

SMIG Risk / Return Rank: 27
SMIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
SMIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
SMIG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SMIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SMIG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISVL vs. SMIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISVL	SMIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	0.99	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	1.53	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.18	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	1.39	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.95	3.62	+5.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISVL vs. SMIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the SMIG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISVL and SMIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISVL	SMIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	0.99	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.43	+0.26

Drawdowns

ISVL vs. SMIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISVL drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, which is greater than SMIG's maximum drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVL and SMIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISVL	SMIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.48%	-19.65%	-10.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.48%	-8.52%	-3.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.93%	-19.23%	+6.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	-1.79%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.66%	-6.55%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	3.27%	-0.09%

Volatility

ISVL vs. SMIG - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) at 3.65%. This indicates that ISVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISVL	SMIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	3.65%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.01%	8.43%	+3.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.47%	11.98%	+2.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	16.20%	+0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.78%	16.20%	+0.58%

ISVL vs. SMIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISVL has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISVL vs. SMIG - Dividend Comparison

ISVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than SMIG's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF	2.48%	2.69%	3.92%	3.82%	3.37%	2.82%
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF	1.75%	1.82%	1.75%	1.91%	2.00%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISVL and SMIG in my portfolio?

ISVL and SMIG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISVL or SMIG?

ISVL has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to SMIG (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISVL dropped -30.48% vs SMIG's -19.65%.

Which ETF is better, ISVL or SMIG?

On 3-year performance, ISVL leads with 21.34% vs 13.09% for SMIG. On fees, ISVL is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SMIG has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISVL or SMIG?

Over the 3-year period, ISVL has performed better with a 21.34% return vs 13.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISVL or SMIG?

ISVL is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISVL or SMIG?

ISVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.75% for SMIG.

What is the main difference between ISVL and SMIG?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISVL and 0.60% for SMIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.