ISVBF vs. NBCE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) and Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE).

ISVBF and NBCE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISVBF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. NBCE is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Oct 13, 2023.

Performance

ISVBF vs. NBCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) and Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ISVBF vs. NBCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	-6.48%	30.64%	18.96%	-3.53%
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF	4.06%	39.08%	3.35%	-2.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISVBF achieves a -6.48% return, which is significantly lower than NBCE's 4.06% return.

ISVBF

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -4.98%
• YTD: -6.48%
• 6M: -13.49%
• 1Y: 6.38%
• 3Y*: 8.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBCE

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -5.73%
• YTD: 4.06%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 34.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISVBF vs. NBCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISVBF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NBCE's 0.74% expense ratio.

NBCE

Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF

ISVBF

iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

ISVBF vs. NBCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISVBF

ISVBF Risk / Return Rank: 17
ISVBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
ISVBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ISVBF Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ISVBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ISVBF Martin Ratio Rank: 17

NBCE

NBCE Risk / Return Rank: 81
NBCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
NBCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
NBCE Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NBCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
NBCE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISVBF vs. NBCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) and Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISVBF	NBCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	1.68	-1.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	2.15	-1.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.33	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	2.51	-2.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.98	10.78	-9.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISVBF vs. NBCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISVBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the NBCE Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISVBF and NBCE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISVBF	NBCE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	1.68	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	0.70	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between ISVBF and NBCE is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ISVBF vs. NBCE - Dividend Comparison

ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NBCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.

	TTM	2025	2024
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF	1.27%	1.32%	1.20%

Drawdowns

ISVBF vs. NBCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISVBF drawdown since its inception was -53.78%, which is greater than NBCE's maximum drawdown of -28.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVBF and NBCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISVBF	NBCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.78%	-28.42%	-25.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.18%	-13.14%	-6.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.20%	-6.47%	-17.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-9.66%	-23.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.49%	3.09%	+3.40%

Volatility

ISVBF vs. NBCE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) has a higher volatility of 17.49% compared to Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) at 6.08%. This indicates that ISVBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISVBF	NBCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.49%	6.08%	+11.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.96%	13.52%	+11.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.35%	20.37%	+10.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.03%	24.19%	+5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.03%	24.19%	+5.84%